Random
The Hate Mongers Among Us – Part 4: Staying on Message to Advance the Narrative
September 13, 2010 by Jeff Gates · 9 Comments
Keeping the “anti-Semitism” theme front-and-center remains essential to advance the hate-monger’s narrative with the assistance of mainstream media.
Thus the Anti-Defamation League criticized the current cover of Time magazine for what ADL President Abe Foxman suggested was a portrayal of Israelis as more interested in making money than in striking a peace accord with the Palestinians.
The article highlighted Israel’s booming real estate market and the pleasure Israelis are taking in late-Summer vacations.
Nevertheless, according to Foxman: “The insidious subtext of Israeli Jews being obsessed with money echoes the age-old anti-Semitic falsehood that Jews care about money above any other interest, in this case achieving peace with the Palestinians.”
Foxman insisted that Managing Editor Richard Stengel issue an apology to readers both for the timing of the article and for calling up old anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jews and money.
As if right on cue, the next day filmmaker Michael Moore jumped into the Islamic Cultural Center debate, arguing that the center should not be near the 911 site but inside it as a way for Muslims to recover their religion from Islamic extremists.
In his branded controversial style, Moore could have left it at that. Instead, he used his assured media profile to relate an account of George Washington’s wish to see Jews receive equal rights.
Impressionistic Warfare
From a psy-ops perspective, the subject matter is secondary to the impressions left with the public. The imbedding of imagery and emotion is the strategic purpose of much of what you see.
For instance, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, speaking to ABC’s “This Week,” said on September 12th that the controversy over the site of an Islamic Cultural Center has heightened concerns among Muslims of rising anti-Muslim sentiment, saying he felt there was “growing Islamophobia in this country.”
That’s a foreseeable result of creating widely shared impressions that foster and sustain widely shared beliefs that, in turn, are kept intact with emotional triggers. That’s how the hate-monger narrative progresses in plain sight.
When waging war in the shared field of consciousness, the most powerful weapon is often the power of association. Michael Moore’s film success shows how it’s done.
In his popular Fahrenheit 911, he deployed impressionistic “weaponry” to associate the war in Iraq with “Bush Oil.” How was that done? He showed on film that one of the several dozen siblings of Osama bin Laden served on the board of advisers to the Carlyle Group, an investment banking firm in Washington, D.C.
Also serving on that board was former president George H.W. Bush, the father of George W. Bush. Therefore, by the power of association, the war in Iraq was for “Bush Oil.” Storylines don’t need to true, just plausible. The point of psy-ops is not reality but credibility.
Impressions gain the traction required to advance a storyline—in plain sight.
Consensus beliefs create and sustain a narrative—in plain sight.
Psy-ops succeed when they attract enough eyeballs to misdirect the public’s attention—in plain sight.
Fahrenheit 911 was produced by Miramax, a Disney subsidiary. Miramax co-chairman Harvey Weinstein loudly claimed that Disney reneged on its promise to distribute Moore’s film. Disney chief executive Michael Eisner objected—just as loudly.
The high profile sparing between these two Hollywood titans dragged on for months in mainstream media. By the time the film was released, the interest generated by this “dispute” ensured that Moore’s film opened on a record number of screens for a “documentary.”
At virtually no cost, that public relations ploy helped ensure an international audience for a film that discredited not only the U.S. but also the office of the president. In its practical effect, the Moore film helped ensure there was virtually no mention of how key Zionist goals were advanced by this war—in plain sight.
Real-time Terror
Meanwhile, September 12 news reports highlighted the extradition to France from Egypt of a terrorist who reportedly planned to bomb an Israel Defense Forces event in Paris. Noticeably absent were facts about the timeframe of this threat or even when the arrest was made.
That account provided an opportunity for the chief of French intelligence to make a high profile announcement that the risk of a terrorist attack on France “has never been higher.” This week, the French Senate is scheduled to vote a ban on wearing Islamic veils known as burgas, a vote certain to reinforce The Clash of Civilizations as the consensus narrative
Also on September 12, the leader of Shin Bet announced in Tel Aviv: “Hamas forces in Gaza and the West Bank are engaged in an effort to foil peace talks.” Israel’s domestic security chief told cabinet ministers “threats are due to increase in the near future, as diplomatic developments occur…This isn’t just an estimate but is supported by real intelligence.”
Unmentioned in this volatile mix is the psychology of the hate monger. The purveyors of hate routinely project onto their opponents both their own personality traits (hatred) and, as here, their anticipated agenda. This announcement is far more likely to mean that Shin Bet will stage provocations designed to make it appear that Hamas is the instigator of violence.
For the Zionist agenda to continue in plain sight, peace must be avoided no matter what the cost. Disruption of the peace process, in turn, must plausibly be the work of others. The hate monger must appear to be hated; the aggressor must plausibly appear to be the victim.
Thus the need to portray as anti-Semitic (a hater) those who document the dynamics of how hate-mongers induce hate—in plain sight.
The Assassination of Bibi Netanyahu
Should we see a revival of the U.S. national security apparatus, we will also see a push back against the right-wing extremist coalitions that have long ruled Israel. However, any resistance to the Zionist agenda runs the risk that Israel’s masters of game theory warfare will collapse another government.
That’s how Tel Aviv responded when in June 1963, President John F. Kennedy pressured David Ben-Gurion for inspections of Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. This young president sought to ensure that the Zionists of that era did not start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. He foresaw what we now see.
Before JFK’s strongly worded letter could be physically delivered, Ben-Gurion resigned citing undisclosed personal reasons. By the time a replacement governing coalition was in place and fully functional, the Kennedy problem had been handled.
In the parlance of national security, that’s called an entropy strategy.
Fast-emerging circumstances suggest the likelihood of a similar strategy, particularly should there emerge any prospect of peace with the Palestinians. As Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman candidly put it, peace is impossible: “not next year and not for the next generation.”
Should “Bibi” pressure his fragile governing coalition for an extension of the “temporary partial freeze” on settlements, members of his nationalist government could withdraw, collapsing the government. Key members of the coalition signaled their intentions on September 12th by announcing that any extension of the freeze will end the Netanyahu government.
On September 13th, four Likud Party members threatened to withdraw budget support if the freeze is extended. That threat was issued as Netanyahu departed for peace talks in Sharm el-Sheikh with Palestinian leaders and U.S. Secretary of State Clinton.
The recurring possibility of governmental collapse has long given Tel Aviv leverage over peace talks sought by the U.S. That era may soon draw to a close if our national security apparatus is now guiding U.S. foreign policy. To date, our elected officials have proven themselves unable to navigate through the manipulations often deployed by Israel to stymie agreement on the terms of a peace accord.
Tel Aviv knows the power that the perception of political vulnerability offers in negotiations. When the game theory dynamics of Israeli psy-ops are fully grasped, that leverage will quickly dissipate as negotiators realize they have long been manipulated. That makes the duplicity personal.
The key barrier to realization is the fast-fading belief among policy-makers in the U.S. and the E.U. that Israel is an ally and a friend rather than a sophisticated foe skilled at using deception to leverage its small numbers to great effect.
Though collapse is one possible strategy, Bibi may instead be assassinated.
The threads of a plausible storyline were laid in a September 9th article on Haaretz.com where he was compared to French president Charles de Gaulle against whom French nationalists staged numerous assassination attempts.
Either approach would inject enough entropy into the peace process to sustain the Palestinian conflict and extend the occupation yet again.
Either strategy would strengthen the hand of the hate-mongers as settlers build another 19,000 homes and U.S. legislators continue to pretend that the Zionist state is a victim of anti-Semitism rather than a serial agent provocateur.
Since the imbalance in relative power is what it is, there is no honest chance of peace given Israel’s agenda, I suppose an assasination of Nitwityahoo would be a minor consolation prize to be gained from seeing a doomed peace process ended once again.
[Reply]
Thanks for the excellent review and summary, Jeff Gates!
mike
[Reply]
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a fraud, or American and Israeli asset it seems.
The mosque CIA connections
http://www.observer.com/2010/politics/untangling-new-intrigue-behind-ground-zero-mosque
Mossad recruiting Arabs
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/09/israeli_spies_pitching_us_musl.html
As tensions with Iran escalate, according to former CIA officer Philip Giraldi, “Israeli agents have become more aggressive in targeting Muslims living in the United States as well as in operating against critics.”
“There have been a number of cases reported to the FBI about Mossad officers who have approached leaders in Arab-American communities and have falsely represented themselves as ‘U.S. intelligence,’ ” Giraldi wrote recently in American Conservative magazine.
“Because few Muslims would assist an Israeli, this is done to increase the likelihood that the target will cooperate. It’s referred to as a ‘false flag’ operation.”
Giraldi’s piece continued, “Mossad officers sought to recruit Arab-Americans as sources willing to inform on their associates and neighbors. The approaches, which took place in New York and New Jersey, were reportedly handled clumsily, making the targets of the operation suspicious.”
The State Department and the Bush administration had sent this man to Middle Eastern countries to help with “counter terrorism”. This man is of the ASMA society. Some of the supporters are the Rockefellars:
http://www.asmasociety.org/home/p_support.html
The same Rockefellers who are related to John D. Rockefeller, the man who financed the Palestine Archaeological Museum to change into the Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem,Israel.
He is on the religious advisory committee of Council on Foreign Relations.
http://www.cfr.org/about/outreach/religioninitiative/advisory_board.html
Corporate membership of CFR:
http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/roster.html
Includes KBR(Halliburton) and Veritas CapitalFund, two top companies profiting from the Iraq war.
Goldman Sachs, Rockefeller Group International, Rothschild North America (The Rothchilds have helped in creating Israel, Alphonse Rothschild supported the creation of Eretz Israel)
Individual membership:
http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html
Numerous Neocons and Zionists on that list.
This mosque controversy was done to create Islamophobia, and invade Iran.
[Reply]
The Jewish Encyclopedia:
“Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.
The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972):
“Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism… In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature, the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars, thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated from within the former Khazar Empire.
The Bible:
Relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem:
“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”
(Genesis 10:1-3)
Therefore, the Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.
The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 10, (1971) relates the following about the Khazars (Chazars):
“Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism.”
(Encyclopedia Judicia, Vol. 10, (1971)
Academic American Encyclopedia, Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66 states:
“The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. during the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the Kagan (King) were converted to Judaism.
Collier’ s Encyclopedia, Volume 14, page 65 states:
“Khazars [kaza'rz], a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century…in the Eighth Century Khaghan Bulan decided in favor of the Jews and accepted Judaism for himself and for his people.
The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822, states:
“Khazars (khah’-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. The Khazar Royal Family and aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 A.D.) and Judaism was thereafter regarded as the State Religion.
REVELATION 2:9,,3:9.
Jewish author, Arthur Koestler(The Thirteenth Tribe).
Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman:
The Invention of the Jewish People BY Shlomo Sand
The Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook
The Kuzari and The Shaping of Jewish Identity,1167-1900 by Adam Shear
“It’s a Trick, We Always Use It.” (calling people “anti-Semitic”) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUGVPBO9_cA
[Reply]
According to Islamic narration – no child is born in hatred. It is his parents, religion and society which makes him hateful. One who has studied the Jewish history from objective sources or Jewish Talmud – would know from where the Zionist Jews receive their hatred toward non-Jews or even the Jews who criticize Zionists’ narration of world history.
The results of an April 2010 Poll, conducted by the Madrid-based Casa Sefarad-Israel (Spain-Israel House ), which is affiliated with the Spanish Foreign Ministry and promotes ties between Spain and Israel and world Jewry – but released on Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashana shows that one in nine Spaniards think that “Israel should ‘disapper’ because it was established on Arab land” (more Jew-hating than Iranian President Ahmadinejad, who only called for the disappearance of the ‘Zionist-regime’).
The poll also reveals that one out of three Spaniards are ‘anti-Semite’ not because they hate Jews – but because they’re critical of Israeli treatment of the native Muslim and Christian Palestinians.
Earlier poll results from 2008 and 2009 conducted by the Zionist Anti-Defamation League and the Pew Research Center showing that close to half of all Spaniards at the time held anti-Semitic views. The two polls designated Spain an anti-Semitic country after finding that more than 35 percent of its citizens held anti-Jewish views. Ironically, however, in the most recent poll, 34.6 percent of respondents expressed anti-Semitic views, thereby barely escaping the anti-Semitic label according to that criterion. At an event at which the new findings were released, Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Moratinos said the poll showed Spanish society is not anti-Semitic or anti-Israel.
How strong bonds Madrid has with Tel aviv can be judged by Spain’s former Prme Minister, Jose Maria Aznar (1996-2004), who is listed as an “Author” on Israel Hasbara Committee’s list – wrote an article for The Times (June 17, 2010), titled If Israel goes down; we all go down. Therefore, to calm down Zionists’ itchy nerves, Madrid has assured that 54% of the respondents had negative views about Muslims.
And how these Zionazi thugs get paranoid – can be judged by reaction of Abraham Foxman, chief of Anti-Defamation League. The ‘Israel-First’ American Jew has called the TIMES’ (a pro-Israel Jew-owned magazine) cover story, which depict Israeli Jews being more interested in day-to-day ‘good -life’ activities (cafe, porno movies, brothels, spitting on priests, racism, etc.) than negotiating long-lasting peace with Palestinians.
In his ‘Zion fatwa’, Abe Foxman said: “Time magazine cover story claiming Israelis are more interested in their booming economy than reaching an historical peace agreement with the Palestinians is another version of the anti-Semitic falsehood that Jews prefer money above any other interest.
In a letter to Managing Editor Richard Stengel, Foxman called on the magazine’s editors to issue an apology to readers, both for the timing of the article and its calling up age-old anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jews and money.
Muslims ruled Spain from 711 -1492 CE. However, due to their tolerance towards Jews and Christians – Muslims remained in minority. The Jew-hating Jew Orientalist, Dr. Bernard Lewis, called Muslim Spain as the Golden Age of Jews. After the fall of the last Muslim enclave of Granada in 1492, The Crusaders murdered between 3-5 million Muslims and 137,000 Jews. Thousands of Jews were forced to adopt Christianity. The self-denying Zionist Jews who themselves had collaborated with the Nazis, wants Jews to forget Muslims’ special tolerance towards their ancestors.
Between the middle of the 16th century to the end of the 19th century – No Muslim community existed in Spain. The significant number of Muslims arrived in Spain in the 1970s from Morocco to meet the local industrial labor demand. The relations between the one million Muslim immigrants and the 40 million local Christian-majority was not that bad until in 2004 – Israeli Mossad and its local Sayim carried out the Madrid train bombing and blamed it on the non-existent Al-Qaeda.
Finally, if any of the readers want to check-out if he/she is an ‘anti-Semite’ – here is a partial list to follow.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/poll-anti-semitism-on-rise-in-spain/
[Reply]
I believe, as you do, that the Zionists don’t want peace. That much is clear. But I also believe that the failure of the so-called peace process in its current form is in the Palestinians’ best interests, too. The Zionists don’t seem to understand what HAMAS and others clearly do: that the dream of a ‘Greater Israel’ is destined to fail.
What a delicious irony it is that the Zionist project is, and always has been, that shitty little state’s only real “existential threat”.
[Reply]
The Zionist leaders know that a ‘peaceful’ co-existence with the natives would ultimately result in the demise of WZC’s dream of Eretz Israel – as it happened in the case Franks’ occupation of Palestine in the 12th century. That’s the reason David Ben Gurion said that “conflicts and wars are eseential for the survival of Israel”.
If you think Benji Netanyahu or Ben Obama is interested in a durable peace in the Middle East for the benefit of Jewish future – should not they be negotiating with Palestians’ elected representatives, Hamas, instead of the rejected party of Abu Mazen (Abbas)?
2010 Top Ten Truths About Israel
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/2010-top-ten-truths-about-israel/
[Reply]
Dr. Kevin Barrett in an open letter to Ben Obama on August 5, 2010 – has demanded that his administration should “build a mega-mosque on Ground Zero (instead of the proposed Islamic Center away from it) to atone 9/11 inside job” for which Muslims were falsely blamed and being killed all over the world. “This mosque should house a 9/11 Truth Museum documenting the evidence that 9/11 was carried out by the US and Israeli insiders, not Muslims,” Dr. Kevin Barrett wrote. This Museum, like the Holocaust Museum Washington DC, must be paid by the US taxpayers……..
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/american-jews-ask-will-americans-ever-know/
[Reply]
David S. Broder (born 9/11-1929), the Jewish columnist with the Jewish-owned The Washington Post, writing under the heading “How Obama might recover” said that Barack Obama should bomb Iran to boost American economy and get re-elected in 2012.
“Here is where Obama is likely to prevail. With strong Republican support in Congress for challenging Iran’s ambition to become a nuclear power, he can spend much of 2011 and 2012 orchestrating a showdown with the mullahs. This will help him politically because the opposition party will be urging him on. And as tensions rise and we accelerate preparations for war, the economy will improve,” he wrote.
I remember reading a similar economic predictions from neocons (mostly Jewish) ahead of Afghan War (2001) and Iraq War (2003).
It’s interesting to note that while the US economy is in recession, thanks to wars for Israel (Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza) and US$968 billion bail-out for The (Jewish) Wall Street. Some American economy-pundits predict that it’s going to cost American taxpayers more than US$3 trillion for the US wars for Israel in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Dean Baker with the Center for Economic and Policy Research had this to say to the ‘Iranophobe’ David Broder: “So, we have two routes to prosperity. We can either build up our physical infrastructure and improve the skills and education of our workers or we can go kill Iranians. Broder has made it clear where he stands”.
Contrary to America’s financial mess – IMF in its 2010 report said that Islamic Republic even under 30-year western sanctions – has become the third largest exporter in the Middle East after Saudi Arabia ($242.5 billion) and UAE ($220.3 billion). Iran’s export stood at US$95 billion. Iran’s non-oil export has already passed US$14.3 billion during the current year.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/broder-war-with-iran-will-get-obama-re-elected/
[Reply]