Criminal State, Israel lobby
Obama’s Inner Eisenhower
September 27, 2010 by Jeff Gates · 19 Comments
Is Barack Obama waking up to the agenda of those who produced his political career? Was his “Inner Eisenhower” on display last week in his televised speech to the U.N. General Assembly?
Did listeners detect a distraught commander-in-chief seeking to bypass Congress and appeal directly to the international community for help in containing Israel’s expansionist goals?
In 1948, the Joint Chiefs cautioned Harry Truman about the “fanatical concepts” of a Jewish-Zionist elite that sought recognition as a legitimate state. U.S. military leaders warned Truman that this elite wanted “military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.”
Albert Einstein and other prominent Jews were even more critical. They cautioned Americans about the Zionist political party that produced Menachem Begin, Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu, calling it a “terrorist party” with “the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party.”
Eight years later, President Eisenhower experienced how they advance their agenda when, during the last days of his November 1956 presidential campaign, Israel, France and Britain sought to induce a war with Egypt over control of the Suez Canal.
Though Ike was distracted by presidential politics, London and Paris were quickly persuaded to abandon their efforts. Not Tel Aviv. Then as now, Jewish fanatics were not inclined to listen to a U.S. commander-in-chief regardless of the impact of their behavior on our national interests.
When this Republican leader sought Congressional support to counter the Zionists’ agenda, he found none. That’s when this former five-star general turned in desperation to a televised address to counter Israeli Congressional influence that has grown far stronger over the past 54 years.
In April 2010, a bipartisan 363 members of Congress committed themselves to an “unbreakable bond” with Israel—regardless of its behavior. No one dared even whisper the word treason.
That same Israel-first agenda was addressed to the commander-in-chief over the signatures of 76 Senators led by Democrat Barbara Boxer of California. GOP Congressman Eric Cantor of Virginia and New York Senator Charles Schumer, a Democrat, launched a bipartisan pro-Israel assault on the commander-in-chief that sounded less like the Congress than the Knesset.
Obama’s Inner Ike
Could this be why Obama made an appeal to the international community to halt Israeli expansionism? Like Ike, did he wake-up to the fact of Israeli dominance in the Congress?
Has this young president—with no military experience—been forced to face the reality of an enemy within? If so, we may yet have an opportunity to restore representative government. If so, those who deceived the U.S. to invade Iraq for a Zionist agenda may yet be held accountable.
However, this past week also saw Congressman Barney Frank join others circulating a petition to free Israeli Master Spy Jonathan Pollard. A dual-citizen operative, Pollard did more damage to our national security than anyone in U.S. history. When he stole more than one million classified documents and Tel Aviv sold them to Moscow, our “special friend” gutted Cold War defenses on which American taxpayers spent more than $20 Trillion (in 2010 dollars) from 1948-1989.
Is Barney Frank committing treason? Or is he circulating that petition so that our national security apparatus has a list of those complicit in the treason that induced us to war in the Middle East on false pretenses? Was Obama’s speech to the U.N. a cry for help by a president whose advisory corps is dominated by pro-Israelis and Israeli-Americans?
Few Americans realize that Obama is a political product of the Chicago Outfit, commencing with Penny Pritzker, his top fundraiser according to his April 2007 filing with the Federal Elections Commission. Pritzker’s grandfather and great-grandfather were mob lawyers.
His second-ranked fundraiser was Chicago’s affluent Crown clan (né Krinsky) whose dominant ownership stake in General Dynamics ensured additional riches both from waging the “war on terror” and from Homeland Security. The third-ranked financier active in producing the Obama phenomenon was financial manipulator George Soros, recently rebranded a “progressive.”
Chicagoan Abner Mikva, White House counsel to Bill Clinton, captured the essence of the challenge Americans now face—regardless of party. A former Congressman, Mikva describes Obama as “our first Jewish president.” He should know.
Americans have been deceived for so long, we may be unable to discern the truth even when confessed by those who know it best. Did this eloquent young community organizer realize just this past week that his political success was produced by descendants of organized crime and those loyal to a foreign nation?
Chosen by The Chosen
America finds itself torn between two competing narratives. The first remains loyal to our founding principles in defense of our core freedoms. The second group now grasps that those who induced us to war with phony intelligence misused those freedoms to advance their agenda. How does our commander in chief expose those who befriended us in order to betray us?
With the all-pervasive Congressional influence wielded by Zionist Jews and Zionist Christians, what is a commander-in-chief to do? Is that why Barack Obama turned to television to make an appeal for help from the international community? Or is that just my wishful thinking?
With representative government in the U.S. now dominated by those who share beliefs contrary to our core principles, what is the head of our executive branch to do?
Americans have long been oblivious to Zionist influence. Did Barack Obama just awaken from a self-induced slumber and recall to whom his oath of office obliges him? Perhaps.
Two days ago, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas echoed the same cautionary words as Albert Einstein and the Joint Chiefs when describing Israel’s “mentality of expansion and domination.”
Little has changed over six decades except the faces on this perilous fascism. Obama may yet become part of the solution. Or, unlike Ike, he may succumb to the pressures of mid-term elections and again support the induced fanaticism now playing out as The Clash of Civilizations.
Although I’ve not seen Obama’s UN address, I feel I can respond by saying it quite probably is wishful thinking, though perhaps on some unconscious level Obama feels trapped and hadn’t thought beyong his ambitions about what would be required of him by his Jewish masters who created him. There is little doubt though, that he knows where the butter on his bread comes from, and it’s not the Irish. Our body-politic is so filled with this zio-viris that only a revolution of sorts is the only remedy, but not one with guns and pitchforks but a general rising up and taking back the keys and sending most of Congress to prison and AIPAC packing back to Tel Aviv. But I dare say, we are far too passive as a people, and the zionists way too rich, organized, brutal and in total control of mass media to cobat them. things may have to fall apart first, much like the Soviet Union, which these very same zios created as well. But we must march on. Peter
[Reply]
Perhaps our representatives are mindful of what happened to the leader of that U.S. military and diplomatic resistance to the creation of the aggressive, ethnic-supremacist state of Israel, Secretary of Defense James Forrestal:
“Pro-Israel writers like [Arnold] Rogow, [Walter] Winchell biographer, Neal Gabler, Jack Anderson, Charles Higham, John Loftus, and Mark Aarons have continued the character assassination against Forrestal, falsely characterizing him as an an anti-Semitic nut who had made several previous suicide attempts. This claim of several previous suicide attempts, echoed at this Arlington Cemetery web site: http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jvforres.htm , is virtually proved to be false by the testimony of Forrestal’s Bethesda Hospital doctors in the Willcutts Report. They agree that, from all indications, he had never before attempted suicide.
“The indications are very strong that Forrestal kept his no-suicide-attempt record intact on May 22, 1949, and became another casualty of the creation of the state of Israel in the same sense that Lord Moyne, Count Bernadotte, Yitzhak Rabin, Rachel Corrie, 34 crewmen on the USS Liberty, and Palestinian leaders on a regular basis have been casualties.”
http://dcdave.com/article4/040927.html
[Reply]
All of the articles I’ve read by Mr. Gates have been intelligent and well-written, but this one makes me think he must be smoking some of that Afghan opium coming from those Pentagon protected poppy fields.
Obama is a spineless creature, put into place by Zionists and Neocons and who then proceeded to fill his administration with more Jews and Zionists than any previous president.
He’s also shown himself to be a skillful liar and con artist, carrying on the Bill of Rights trashing that GW Bush did and you suddenly think he’s had an ‘Eureka’ moment?
Forget it, our nation was taken over a long time ago by a sadistic collection of liars, thieves, con artists, ego maniacs and mass murderers who like to wage war for fun and profit and Obama is no different.
He’ll kiss Israeli ass until the day he finally meets his maker.
[Reply]
Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower was a Crypto-Jew. His father, David Jacob Eishenhower died as a Jew. Gen. Eisenhower, as commander of the Allied Forces, was responsible for the Holocaust of 1.7 million German Christians.
http://www.rense.com/general46/germ.htm
Obama, on the other hand, has totally different agenda to fullfil, which is to destroy every one who is against the Zionist entity. Like Eisenhower, Obama, too has links to Jewishness. Both his mother and wife is reportedly have Jewish blood. One of his wife’s cousin is a ‘Black Rabbi’ in the US.
Anyone, who has read the Chicago Jewish News (October 24, 2008) boasting that it were the people belonging to Chicago Jew Mafia who had groomed Ben Obama’s political career – would know who Obama is trying to protect.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/25/911-obama-lives-in-self-denial/
[Reply]
I hope you are right but I cannot see Barry embracing a Constitutional Republic, even if he wakes up to what is going on. He was groomed since birth for this role and programmed accordingly.
[Reply]
Sorry google Obama’s speech to AIPAC. He knew and knows who rules him, congress and Wall St. They have material on him (and congress) that if exposed would take him down in a second (think Clinton) He made a pact with the devil and it has cost America its soul
[Reply]
Obama did not wake up. Nor will the nation. We are a Zionist nation ourselves after all. Manifest Destiny gave us our Empire. The detailed differences between America as Zion and Israel as Zion need not concern us over much. Ultimately there will be one world Zion. Superstition is a basis for political legitimacy when backed by superior firepower. As China demonstrates today in Tibet and Xingkang-UIghur, ideological backed colonization is effective. Israel is seen by most Americans as a suburb of Zion USA. Israel can expand and swallow as much terriotry as it needs so long as they keep to the ideological line that it is their Manifest Destiny. Now it may cause a problem when they encounter a nation better equipped for war-Turkey perhaps-Iran assuredly, but then our firepower can be called upon to help ensure God’s will.
[Reply]
Our country is now geared to an arms economy bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and an incessant propaganda of fear.
Douglas MacArthur
[Reply]
Cry for help? I doubt it…would it really matter if it were?
I remember a much beloved president who really did call out for help, he said so explicitly. His call for help went out over the airwaves and into the homes of millions of Americans. They ignored him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces
[Reply]
President Kennedy was an insider but he did wanted to change the system. He was one the bravest American. Maybe something is totally wrong in the White House now otherwise why an appeal to the American people. Maybe Obama is starting to realize what’s up..come on he is a human too.
Power at the end turns always against the people who aspire it. The American people have go back and discover Kennedy’s dream despite of his personal weaknesses.
[Reply]
Ike himself was most likely sympathetic to the zionist cause, seeing as how he not only had some jewish blood (it’s even in his West Point yearbook), but understood how to gain an alliance w/ powerful ppl who “work behind the scenes”. He got bottom marks at West Point, yet eventually managed to become a Five Star General ahead of many other qualified officers, and because of this real warriors like Patton and MacArthur couldn’t stand him. Eisenhower also had a psychopathic hate for the German people as a RACE. After World War II, Eisenhower kept hundreds of thousands of German POWs reassigned to “Disarmed Enemy Forces” status so he was not forced to feed them, and thus keep them in open fields w/ a fraction of the calories needed to survive. Author James Bacque exposes his behavior in his book “Other Losses”, by making a scrupulous search in KGB files revealing that the 1.4 million (plus?) POWs that died AFTER the war were not done just by the Soviets but @ least 700,000 to 800,000 died in Allied camps.
[Reply]
If he was calling for help, who is going to come? Nobody can stand against the ZOG – except everybody.
[Reply]
Last month, Brookings Institute released results of a poll conducted by Professor Shibley Telhami of Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings Institute – in co-operation with Zogby and the University of Maryland. The participants from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco, Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates expressed they’re more supportive of Iranian President Dr. Ahmadinejad’s views on the Middle East than US President Barack Obama.
Professor Shibley Telhami pointed out that the results of “the poll present problem for the US, which has counted on Arabs seeing Iran as a threat – maybe even bigger one than Israel”.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/28/poll-arabs-prefer-ahmadinejad-over-obama/
[Reply]
Genie Reply:
November 29th, 2010 at 11:44 pm
I never imagined that Obama is “asleep”. But I do often wonder if he knew the whole deal he was getting into. How do any of them go along with the destruction of America? Some, ok but all of them?
[Reply]
pete Reply:
December 28th, 2010 at 11:42 pm
I think Obama is a decent man but if he screws with Israel he & possibly his wife & beautiful little girls will end up on the other side of the grass. This heinous act will of course be done by a Muslim from the middle East. Yeh right.
[Reply]
“Did Barack Obama just awaken from a self-induced slumber and recall to whom his oath of office obliges him?”
To whom exactly DID Obama pledge his allegiance? If you recall he flubbed his lines during the official ceremony, as did Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr..
“”For a couple of smooth-talking constitutional experts, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and President-elect Barack Obama sure had a hard time getting through the constitutional oath of office…The chief justice seemed to say ‘to’ rather than ‘of,’ but that was not the main problem. The main problem was that the word ‘faithfully’ had floated upstream…Mr. Obama seemed to realize this, pausing quizzically after saying ‘that I will execute –’
“The chief justice gave it another go, getting closer but still not quite right: “faithfully the office of president of the United States.” This time, he omitted the word ‘execute.’ Mr. Obama now repeated the
chief justice’s initial error of putting ‘faithfully’ at the end of the phrase. Starting where he had abruptly paused, he said: ‘the office of the president of the United States faithfully.” (“I Do Solemnly
Swear…(Line, Please?,” NY Times, Jan. 20, 2009)
“Here’s how the media reported the second rite: …After a day’s worth of chatter over whether the president had been properly sworn into office…(i)n 25 seconds, President Obama became president again. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. re-administered the oath to Mr. Obama on
Wednesday evening, one day after the two men stumbled over each other’s words during the inauguration ceremony at the Capitol. For their do-over, the two men convened in the White House Map Room at 7:35 p.m. for a brief proceeding that was not announced until it was completed
successfully…Only hours after aides told reporters there was no reason to administer the oath again, they concluded it was easier to do it on the first day, rather than have someone challenge the legitimacy of his presidency…Mr. Obama raised his right hand and did not use a Bible….only nine people witnessed the do-over. There were four aides, four reporters and a White House photographer…” (NY Times, Jan. 22, 2009).
This second-time-around doppelganger oath was the real oath, since the flawed first one, done in the sight of millions and upon the Bible of assassinated President Abraham Lincoln was a “challenge (to) the legitimacy of his presidency…”
There was no Bible the second time and with Obama having been compared to John F. Kennedy during the campaign, and with all of the macabre parallels between Kennedy and Lincoln (Lincoln was killed in Ford’s theatre, Kennedy was killed in a Ford automobile; Lincoln’s secretary was named Kennedy, Kennedy’s secretary was named Lincoln; Lincoln and Kennedy were both succeeded by vice-presidents named Johnson, etc.), I’m not sure that if I were Barack Obama I would have wanted to step into the middle of such a highly charged symbol palimpsest — unless of course the first inaugural oath-taking was little more more than shadow-play.
What appears to be the authentic inauguration took place in a basement, and was an elite rather than a populist rite, with just nine witnesses. It occurred in former President Franklin Roosevelt’s secretive, war-era “map room.” Before FDR, under presidents from Chester Arthur through Wilson and Coolidge, it was reputedly used to play the game of billiards.
The omission of the Bible is not invalidating since the father of our country did not use one at his inauguration and Lyndon Johnson, on the plane to Washington after’s Kennedy’s killing, used a Roman Catholic mass book (“missal”), rather than a Bible. Hence, the absence of a Bible per se does not invalidate the oath, but the peek-a-boo nature of the inaugural Bible may be deliberate, in that its momentous presence at the botched inauguration is all the more glaring in its inexplicable absence
at the real inauguration.
If symbolism is a language, what is being signaled by this apparently deliberate omission?
Another equally striking aspect of the second oath are the photographs of the ceremony, which feature the looming presence of a vintage portrait above the mantle on the wall behind the president and the chief justice.
The oath is a ritual and this ritual has an icon hovering over it, as if by way of spiritual benediction and patronage. As of this writing, in all the prominent photos of the second oath which this writer has seen,
no caption has been provided by the establishment media that identifies the enigmatic man in the portrait. Yet, symbolically, he is the “genius loci,” the presiding spirit of the authentic inaugural ceremony of Barack Obama as President. Like the omission of the Bible after so much was made of its presence at the first oath-taking, the omission of any identification of the figure in the painting at the second oath-taking would seem to be significant.
Let us recall that the second oath was performed in secret: “…the two men convened in the White House Map Room at 7:35 p.m. for a brief proceeding that was not announced until it was completed…”
In Freemasonry the god of the secret societies is covertly substituted for the One True God. This false god is identified in the masonic lodges as “the Great Architect.”
The mysterious man in the portrait who silently presides over the authentic inauguration of Barack Obama as Commander and Chief, is Benjamin Latrobe, the great architect of the U.S. Capitol.”
From: The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
It is also worth recalling that Obama’s flagship legislation in his first year was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009. This mirrors FDR’s National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 which irrevocably set the United States on the road to socialism. The oath was taken, as noted above, in FDR’s war era “map room”.
These signs would indicate that Obama is controlled by the cryptocracy and unlikely to embark on any exposure of them. He also dodged the Lincoln/Kennedy bullet and seems to be committed on an FDR type revolution or final completion of it.
[Reply]
pete Reply:
December 18th, 2010 at 4:37 pm
dave, do you really think taking an oath on the bible, a catholic missel or a roll of toilet paper makes any difference to a politician. They all take oath,s on the bible &never do what they say they are going to do.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates,
I did not realize you had a comment section. What a pleasant surprise!
I wonder what will happen to Obama in the end. Will they make his children grow up without their father? I hope not!
[Reply]
Israel has taken over our country, now they are going after the major cities. Nobody ever heard of that dragass bum Rahm Emmanuel until he went to Washington as Obama,s chief of staff. Now he is running for Mayor of Chicago & I guarantee yoy he will be a shoo in. The unions have already said they are backing Emmanuel & now former President Clinton just arrived in Chicago to raise money for Rahmbo. The only chance he has of losing is if all the black people get out and vote for Moseley-bruan or Danny Davis.. So people of Chicago get out and vote for either of these candidates. I am sure the Zionist controlled media will make up some totally false story, like Danny D avis once had an affair with a goat or some ridiculous story about Moseley-Braun. I guarantee you that Emmanuel will turn against Obama next, Emmanuel is a total sleaze ball.
[Reply]