Criminal State, Front Page, Israel lobby, Politics
Zionist Dominance in the Obama Presidency
January 6, 2010 by Jeff Gates · 18 Comments
Below is the second installment in a 5-part series regarding Pakistan.
Be not deceived by Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name or by the fact that he spent several childhood years in Indonesia. His political career is a product of a Westside Chicago Ashkenazi network with roots that trace directly back to organized crime of the 1920s.
Top fundraiser Penny Pritzker traces her family lineage to grandfather Abe and great-grandfather Nicholas who served as lawyers for organized crime. She declined a nomination as Secretary of Commerce in the Obama Cabinet, a post typically offered top fundraisers. Her confirmation hearings could have proved a political embarrassment by reminding us of the suspect origins of “our” latest president.
Clinton White House counsel Abner Mikva aptly described this high-profile product of the Chicago Outfit as “the first Jewish president.” Plus his Vice President, only a heartbeat from the reins of power, is the reliably obsequious Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden.
For his Secretary of State, Obama appointed a presidential rival, Hillary Clinton, whose political career traces to the same source. After serving as First Lady in the presidency of Arkansas native Bill Clinton, she fled to New York to run for the U.S. Senate knowing she could not win an election—any election—in Arkansas where she is widely reviled.
By staking out extreme pro-Israeli positions, she joined New York Senator Charles Schumer as, in practical effect, the second Jewish Senator from a key electoral state long dominated by this trans-generational criminal syndicate.
The chiefs of staff for Barack and Michele Obama are both Ashkenazim from Chicago, long a center of foreign espionage. That fact was recently reconfirmed by Federal Bureau of Investigation translator Sibel Edmonds when, from FBI wiretaps, she documented the close working relationship between the Israel Lobby and U.S. officials with power over policy making in the Middle East, including Richard Perle, Wolfowitz understudy Douglas Feith and key members of Congress.
Earlier this month, a Chicago man whose father was a Pakistani diplomat was charged with involvement in planning “India’s 911.” In practical effect, the murder of 166 people in Mumbai, India’s financial center, accelerated the destabilization of Pakistan by drawing troops out of the western provinces for redeployment along the eastern border with India. See:
Why Outside Help Is Required
The same syndicate working to destabilize Pakistan is also destabilizing the U.S.—from the inside. That’s why ordinary Americans need the assistance of Pakistanis and others outside the U.S. to restore some semblance of representative government.
The confidence with which this game theory aggression progressed in plain sight could be seen in the behavior of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, a key Zionist insider. Four days after 9-11 while in a principals’ meeting at Camp David, a presidential retreat outside Washington, he proposed that the U.S. invade Iraq. At that time, the intelligence did not point to Iraqi involvement and Osama bin Laden was thought to be hiding in a remote region of Afghanistan.
On that same day, San Diego FBI Special Agent Stephen Butler interrogated Iraqi Munther Ghazal at his home near San Diego to determine if he was funding Mel Rockefeller with whom Ghazal traveled to Baghdad in early 1997. After meeting for several days with Nidhal al-Hamdani, a top nuclear physicist with oversight of Iraq’s mothballed nuclear weapons program, Rockefeller returned to the U.S. with a practical proposal for removing Saddam Hussein without this war and without triggering a violent and destabilizing insurgency.
[Insert 1997 photo of Nidhal al-Hamdani in her office on phone with Saddam Hussein.]
When regional specialists at the U.S. Department of State declined to meet with him, he traveled to Ottawa in April 1997 where he met with Middle East specialists in the Canadian government to ensure a written record would confirm there was an alternative to war in Iraq—six years before the invasion. Instead of debriefing him, FBI agents sought to discredit him.
[Insert fax of April 1997 from Canadian officials to James M. Rockefeller.]
Though FBI agents interviewed Munther Ghazal numerous times, they have yet to meet with Mel Rockefeller. Four packages sent to the Phoenix divisional office of the FBI documenting ongoing treason and criminal stalking were returned, marked “refused.”
FBI Special Agent Butler cashed checks and paid rent for the two San Diego-based hijackers who piloted planes into the World Trade Center towers. The same Iman who counseled Major Nidal Hasan (with FBI knowledge) before he was transferred to Fort Hood—where he went on a shooting spree—also counseled the San Diego-based hijackers—likewise with FBI knowledge.
As of December 18, 2009, no one from either federal law enforcement or national security had debriefed Mel Rockefeller—eight years after 9-11. Had he been engaged in good faith in early 1997 after his return from Baghdad or in early 2001 after his return from Jakarta, the facts suggest that 9-11 might well have been prevented. Good faith engagement after 9-11 could have prevented the invasion of Iraq. Instead, extraordinary steps were taken to discredit him.
When President George H.W. Bush declined to invade Baghdad to remove Saddam Hussein during the 1991 Gulf War, Pentagon Under Secretary for Policy Paul Wolfowitz imposed a No-Fly Zone in northern Iraq. By the time that the invasion of March 2003 began, the Israeli Mossad had more than 100 agents deployed for a decade in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul.
Intelligence reports of Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda were also traced to Mosul—reports that proved false. Mosul again emerged in November 2004 as a center of the insurgency that destabilized Iraq. That reaction precluded the speedy exit of coalition forces promised in Congressional testimony by senior war-planner Wolfowitz.
In the lead-up to the invasion, Wolfowitz assured policy-makers of a swift and welcome regime-change whose $50 billion cost would be recovered from the proceeds of Iraqi oil. Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz has since projected the total cost will exceed $3,000 billion, all of it borrowed. That total, 60 times the original estimate, includes $700 billion in interest paid on war-related debt.
See:
A Closer Look at Israel’s Role in Terrorism
Ft. Hood: “Death By Political Correctness”?
Fort Hood Tragedy: The Real Story of the Terrorist “Mad Doctor Hasan”
Congratulations to Mr Jeff Gates. I am reading your book and cannot put it down. I congratulate you on your courage and bravery. I support your call in the closing chapter to call for independent commissions of inquiry however how will we ever be able to be sure of the “independence” of these commissions unless we know it is composed of people like you and Prof Chomsky and John Pilger and Robert Fisk who are similarly brave and people of integrity.
I wish to advise that I am planning a Global Peace Movement and this will be launched in the next few months.
Kind Regards
Dr. M. Adam
Chairman: Human Rights Foundation
South Africa
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
January 9th, 2010 at 12:32 am
Thanks for your kind comments. Please let me know how best the work here can be supportive of your efforts. I am confident that the trans-generational evidentiary trail will show that many of the world’s troubles, including those in South Africa, trace to a common origin.
[Reply]
Astraea Reply:
August 29th, 2010 at 7:01 am
I suppose Mr. Adam of the Human Rights Foundation knows of Douglas Reed who lived in Durban for the last twenty or thirty – or more – years of his life and where he kept the craft of his now most famous book, “The Conspiracy of Zion.” on top of the wardrobe. He could not get anyone to publish it – but it is now out and has become very famous. It is available on line and can also be read, chapter by chapter at rebelnews.org (great site).
He wrote a lot about South Africa and Southern Africa too.
His writing is essential to understanding what has happened in South Africa, and is happening to our World – OUR World, which the unfortunate Jews like to think is theirs exclusively!
Thank you Mr. Gates for your brilliant, clear, sharp and truthful work for us all.
I am also trying to find out more about what is happening to Russia now. I have read recently the review of “Two Hundred Years Together.” by Solzhenitsyn which was published by
The Barnes Review and I recommend it as strongly as I know how.
Sincerely,
Astraea Shaw.
[Reply]
I’m a combat veteran of that disastrous and genocidal war in Vietnam. A shameful eposide in my life. It pains me deeply to see our young people particapate in yet another slaughter of innocent and defenseless people while sacrificing their own lives.
Excellent work Mr. Gates. I look forward to reading your book and subscribing to your site.
Sincerely,
Mike,
San Diego, CA.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
January 24th, 2010 at 6:02 am
Thanks Mike for taking the time to comment. And thanks for your service.
[Reply]
As long as Zionist control the US we will only have choices between Zionist! It doesn’t matter which party, both parties are controlled by Zionist. The truth is that a foreign power is controlling the US government and that is what needs to change before anything else can change. Every politician that kowtows to AIPAC is a traitor to their country and should be prosecuted as the criminals that they are. If we did that, unfortunately, we wouldn’t have a very large government at all! Only a handful of congressional representatives, no presidential staff and only a few supreme court judges would be left to run our government. When did they take over? My guess is November 22, 1963.
Checks and balances, the Constitution, Bill of Rights, not for a while now. Just a vague memory of what we used to be, before the coup!
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
February 11th, 2010 at 9:26 am
Thanks for your concerns. Guilt By Association documents the simple math by which the Israel lobby, in effect, took control of the Congress. Representative government — with the help of John McCain and Russ Feingold — has been repealed in favor of a Diaspora. The way out is with education and transparency leading to accountability. Please alert your friends to the site and to Guilt By Association.
[Reply]
thank you for your service? WHAT… didn’t the vietnam vet just tell you Gates that it,Vietnam War, was a shameful period of his life… slaughtering innocents around the world is not a service we, the people , should be thankful for. Murdering Iraqis and Afghanis keeps no one safe and secure. It only reinforces the view that Amerika is a terrorist nation along with Israel.
[Reply]
Mr Gates, can you explain what you mean by the Israeli lobby took control of congress with help form Mccain/fiengold…..that the campaign finance laws are bad….in the jews favor.
thanks
jim
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
February 13th, 2010 at 8:06 pm
Thanks for taking the time to visit the site where the “how” of this trans-generational criminality is made transparent. Here’s an excerpt on McCain-Feingold “reform” that you’ll also find posted online in the “Introduction to Guilt By Association” (just click on the order page). You’ll have to look there for the endnotes as the cut-and-paste did not pick them up here….
Making the Case
John McCain’s reform of campaign finance law was a “perfect fit” for the Diaspora-based fundraising used by the Israel lobby. “McCain-Feingold” legislation—co-sponsored with Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin—illustrates a key means by which this criminality became politically systemic. Their reforms boosted the amount (from $1,000 to $2,300) that candidates can lawfully receive from individuals in primary and general elections. This change enables a couple to give a combined $9,200 (4 x $2,300) to as many political candidates as they choose.
Importantly, that reform also doubled the funds candidates can receive without regard to where their supporters reside. A candidate in Iowa, say, may have only a few pro-Israeli constituents. That candidate can now be induced to support Israeli policies as a nationwide network of pro-Zionists contribute to that campaign. That funding strategy has long been deployed with success by the Israel lobby to shape U.S. policy. Under the guise of reform, McCain-Feingold doubled its impact.
The process works like this. Candidates are summoned for in-depth interviews by the Israel lobby—the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Those found sufficiently committed to AIPAC’s agenda are provided a list of donors who can be relied on to “max out” their campaign contributions. Below is the first of many examples to show how an extremist few can wield so much influence over so many:
“Bundlers” raise funds for candidates. After McCain-Feingold reforms became effective in 2003, any experienced AIPAC-identified bundler should be able to raise $1 million for a candidate by contacting 10 friends in the Diaspora.
The bundler and spouse “max out” for $9,200 and call ten others, say, in Manhattan, Miami and Beverly Hills. Each of them max out (10 x $9,200) and call 10 others for a total of 11. [111 x $9,200 = $1,021,200.] Assuming AIPAC endorsed the candidate, one call could fund a modest campaign in many Congressional districts. No one knows the full impact of this political operation over the past six decades.
From Tel Aviv’s perspective, that political leverage is leveraged yet again because fewer than 10% of House races (typically 35 to 50 Congressional districts) are competitive in any election cycle. That makes the long-term leverage even greater for those—such as AIPAC—motivated to sustain this financial focus over multiple cycles.
Are the resources available in this network to sustain a nationwide pro-Israeli electoral strategy behind the cover of McCain-Feingold reform? According to Jewish Achievement, 42% of the largest political donors to the 2000 election cycle were Jewish. Of the Forbes 400 richest Americans, 25% are Jewish. The limitation was not donor money; donors were limited by how much money they could lawfully contribute to AIPAC-screened candidates. McCain removed a key constraint on that influence-peddling strategy.
May 2008 saw the emergence of “joint fundraising committees” that “funneled funds to the candidates’ primary campaigns (that’s the $2,300 part), to the national party (up to $28,500) and, in McCain’s case, to state parties as well ($10,000 each).” An individual can donate up to $65,500 to parties and political action committees. Substitute that figure for $2,300 to calculate the potential impact of wealthy pro-Israelis in today’s post-reform environment.
This nontransparent influence by elites and extremists can be wielded in plain sight, with impunity and under cover of free speech, free elections, free press and even the freedom of religion. Here’s where the self-deceit component becomes critical in order for Americans to believe that this misuse of freedom is genuinely consistent with freedom.
To buy time on the public’s airwaves, money raised from AIPAC’s nationwide network is paid to media outlets owned in substantial part by members of the same network. As McCain and Feingold knew, presidents, senators and congressmen come and go but those who collect the checks rack up the favors that amass real political influence. Over the span of six decades of focused funding and single-issue advocacy, the Israel lobby amassed formidable political clout.
Repeal of Representative Government
America’s federal system of governance was meant to ensure that members of the House represent the concerns of Americans who reside in Congressional districts in this country, not a nationally dispersed network (a Diaspora) concerned about a foreign country (Israel). Similarly, federal elections were meant to hold Senators accountable to concerns of constituents who reside in the states they represent—not policies sought by those living in other states or by a foreign state.
John McCain “reformed” representative government by granting a nationwide network of pro-Israeli elites and Jewish fundamentalists greater influence over election results in every state and Congressional district. With that reform, this network gained more political power—wielding influence that is disproportionate to their numbers, indifferent to their place of residence and often contrary to America’s interests.
AIPAC could organize donors in New York, Florida and California to elect a U.S. Senator, say, in sparsely populated Idaho. The hypothetical Congressional candidate in rural Iowa may find his or her campaign flush with funds not from concerned constituents but from members of an AIPAC bundler’s network who may never set foot in the state. By granting this Diaspora greater sway over elections in both houses of Congress, McCain-Feingold granted Tel Aviv even more power over U.S. policy-making.
McCain proposed his reforms only after the Senate Ethics Committee cited his poor judgment for assisting the Keating Five in a massive financial fraud. As we shall see, his judgment continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace as evidenced by his marketing as “reform” this step toward the repeal of representative government.
[Reply]
Mr Gates do you think that the supreme court ruling allowing corporations freedom to finance canidates will help stifle the israel lobby?
jim
[Reply]
Thanks to Jeff Gates for this critical analysis of the Zionist dominance in the Obama presidency, and his comment analyzing the McCain-Feingold legislation enabling of AIPAC. I, with jim, do wonder what difference the recent Supreme Ct. decision about this legislation might make re the influence of the Israel Lobby, and hope Mr. Gates answers.
As an aside, I am not sorry that Feingold has quit Congress, and sure hope that McCain does not get reelected.
[Reply]
I have not read part 1 of this post. What of two other rabid jewish zionists in Obama’s White House: Rahm Emanuel (Chief of Staff) and David Axelrod (Senior Adviser)?
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
March 15th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
Please read the commentaries posted on the site for answers to your questions. And also read Guilt By Association for more background on “our” latest presidency.
[Reply]
I am flabbergasted by all the numbers and how Mr. Gates has thought this over to put it in words. Intelligence par excellence.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
June 16th, 2010 at 10:01 am
Thanks for your comment. Please alert your friends and colleagues to Guilt By Association. This problem can now be solve provided people do not overstep what can be proven by confirmed facts.
[Reply]
Mr. President was a disciple of Saul Alinski, too. The latter was famous for being very astute at playing “deceptive wars,” against the moral status quo of the 1950’s. Added to this, Mr. Alinski was well known also, by his book titled, “The Rules for Radicals.” This book can be regarded as being the guiding tool for Mr. Obama’s RADICALISM. Finally, Mr. Obama connections with Zionism can be traced down rather very easily. Nonetheless, the powerful and massive networks of information will never venture to give to the American people, his radical and anti-American resume.
[Reply]
Zionists within Obama administration have just achieved a ‘regime change’ in Libya. Now, their next target is ‘regime change’ in Damascus to be followed by a ‘regime change’ in Tehran.
Turkey’s top daily, Milliyet, has reported that French military forces are training Syrian rebels belonging to the US-Israel sponsored ‘Free Syrian Army’ in Turkey and Lebanon. The daily has also claimed that France, Britain and Turkey have agreed to send arms into Syria to bring a regime change in Damascus.
The Turkish daily also stated that the governments of the three countries have received green light from Washington to support the Syrian rebels in every possible way.
The influential French Israel-Firster Jew, Bernard-Henri Levy is running a vicious anti-Bashar campaign and putting pressure on the Crypto-Jew French President Nicolas Sarkosy to eliminate Assad like Qaddafi earlier. Levi ran a similar anti-Muslim campaign against Pakistan in 1971 which resulted in the dismemberment of the country and creation of Bangladesh. Levi is one of the founders of the Libyan rebel National Transitional Council (NTC). Levi had convinced Sarkozy to become the first head of state to recognize NTC in exile. Later, Levi met Israeli Prime Minister Benji Netanyahu and informed him that NTC leaders had promised to recognize Israel. On July 2011 – Bernard-Henri Levi organized a conference of Syrian rebel groups which was attended by Israeli officials and a member of Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood.
In a revealing installment of his weekly column at Le Point magazine titled “Endgame in Syria,” Bernard-Henri Levy claims that Syrian opposition figures he’s in touch with are increasingly coming around to the view that military intervention, Libya-style, may be the only way to get rid of the regime in Damascus.
Levy, who bragged in his last book about the strong influence he has over French President Nicolas Sarkozy, confessed that the two conspired together to marginalize the French foreign ministry so that it would not impede NATO’s intervention in Libya.
In his recent column, Levy reveals secret efforts he has undertaken in the past few months to convince Syrian opposition figures to support him in what he calls the “Gaddafi theory.”
In the column, Levi admits that what is holding back France, Britain, the US and NATO to conduct Libyan-style direct military intervention in Syria – is because Syrian opposition leaders whom he met told him that “they would prefer to die than say the word ‘intervention’ or ‘international intervention’.”
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/the-israeli-puppets-against-syria/
[Reply]