Criminal State, Israel lobby, Politics
What is Israel’s Role in the Destabilization of Pakistan?
November 11, 2009 by Jeff Gates · 12 Comments
When waging war “by way of deception,” the motto of the Israeli Mossad, well-timed crises play a critical agenda-setting role by displacing facts with what a target population can be deceived to believe. Thus the force-multiplier effect when staged crises are reinforced with pre-staged intelligence. In combination, the two often prove persuasive.
That duplicity was on display when U.S. lawmakers were induced to invade Iraq in response to the mass murder of 9-11. That crisis alone, however, was insufficient. Military mobilization required a “consensus” belief in Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi mobile biological weapons, Iraqi meetings in Prague, and so forth. Though all were false, those “facts” proved sufficient to induce an invasion of Iraq.
Such agent provocateur operations typically include collateral incidents as pre-staging for the intended main event. Ongoing incidents suggest a follow-on operation is underway. Recent history suggests we’ll see an orgy of evidence that plausibly indicts a pre-staged Evil Doer. Though Iran is an obvious candidate, Pakistan is also a possibility where outside forces have been destabilizing this nuclear Islamic nation with a series of violent incidents.
Will it be coincidence if the next war—like the last—is consistent with the expansive goals of Jewish nationalists?
The Indo-Israel Alliance
December 2007 saw the murder of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Mark Siegel, her Ashkenazim biographer and lobbyist, assured U.S. diplomats that her return was “the only possible way that we could guarantee stability and keep the presidency of Musharraf intact.”
President Pervez Musharraf had announced that resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict was essential to the resolution of conflicts in Iraq and neighboring Afghanistan. That comment made him a target for Tel Aviv.
During Bhutto’s two terms as prime minister, Pakistani support for the Taliban—then celebrated as the freedom-fighting Mujahadin—enabled her to wield influence in Afghanistan while also catalyzing conflicts in Kashmir. By fueling tension with India, she also fueled an Indo-Israel alliance as Tel Aviv provided New Delhi an emergency shipment of artillery shells during a conflict over the Kirpal region of Kashmir.
In May 2009, Israel delivered to India the first of three Phalcon Airborne Warning & Control Systems (AWACS) shifting the balance of conventional weapons in the region. That sale confirmed what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had earlier announced: “Our ties with India don’t have any limitation….” That became apparent in April when Israel signed a $1.1 billion agreement to provide India an advanced tactical air defense system developed by Raytheon, a U.S. defense contractor.
In August 2008, Ashkenazim General David Kezerashvili returned to Georgia from Tel Aviv to lead an assault on separatists in South Ossetia with the support of Israeli arms and training. That crisis ignited Cold War tensions between the U.S. and Russia, key members of the Quartet (along with the EU and the UN) pledged to resolve the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Little was said about the Israeli interest in a pipeline across Georgia meant to move Caspian oil through Turkey and on to Eurasia, using Israel as an intermediary while undermining Russia’s oil industry.
More Game Theory Warfare?
Bhutto’s murder ensured a crisis that replaced Musharaff with Asif Ali Zardari, her notoriously corrupt husband. By Washington’s alliance with Zardari, the U.S. could be portrayed as extending its corrupting influence in the region.
On August 7, 2008, the Zadari-led ruling coalition called for a no-confidence vote in Parliament against Musharraf just as he was departing for the Summer Olympics in Beijing. On August 8, heavy fighting erupted overnight in South Ossetia. As with many of the recent incidents in Pakistan, this violent event involved armed separatists.
But for pro-Israeli influence inside the U.S. government, would our State Department have installed in office the corrupt Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan, leading to record-level poppy production? Is the heroin epidemic presently eroding Russian society traceable to Israel’s infamous game theory war-planners? See: How Israel Wages Game Theory Warfare and Israel and 9-11.
In late November 2008, a terrorist attack in Mumbai, India’s financial center, renewed fears of nuclear tension between India and Pakistan. When the attackers struck a hostel managed by Chabad Lubavitch, an ultra-orthodox Jewish sect from New York, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni announced from Tel Aviv: “Our world is under attack.” By early December, Israeli journalists urged that we “fortify the security of Jewish institutions worldwide.”
Soon after “India’s 9-11” was found to include operatives from Pakistan’s western tribal region, Zardari announced an agreement with the Taliban to allow Sharia law to govern a swath of the North West Frontier Province where Al Qaeda members reportedly reside.
Pakistani cooperation with “Islamic extremists” created the impression of enhanced insecurity and vulnerability for the U.S. and its allies. That perceived threat was marketed by mainstream media as proof of the perils of “militant Islam.”
With the Taliban and Al Qaeda portrayed as operating freely in a nuclear-armed Islamic state, Tel Aviv gained traction for its claim that a nuclear Tehran posed an “existential threat” to the Jewish state. Meanwhile Israel’s election of an ultra-nationalist/ultra-orthodox coalition further delayed resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
More delay is destined to evoke more extremism and gain more traction for those marketing the “global war on terrorism.” Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni argued after the assault in Mumbai: “Israel, India and the rest of the free world are positioned in the forefront of the battle against terrorists and extremism.”
In announcing that list, Islamabad was indicted by its exclusion even though Pakistan is dominantly Sunni and, unlike Iran’s Shi’a, abhors theocratic rule. The fact patterns suggest that Pakistan, not India, was the target of the murderous terrorism in Mumbai.
Advised by legions of Ashkenazim, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent mission to Islamabad was a diplomatic disaster. Abrasive and arrogant, America’s top diplomat reinforced Pakistani concerns that it is surrounded by hostile forces and that the nation is being set up to fail by Jewish nationalist advisers to a nation it considered an ally.
In a climate of heightened tensions, Clinton undermined U.S. interests, boosted the Israeli case for a global war on “Islamo-fascism” and lent credence to the Clash of Civilizations.
Destabilization as a Prequel to Domination
As Afghanistan and Pakistan join other nations being destabilized by outside forces, key questions must be answered:
- Was India’s 9-11 a form of geopolitical misdirection meant to serve both the tactical goals of Muslim extremists and the strategic goals of Jewish nationalists? Who benefits—within Pakistan—from humiliation at the hands of India and the U.S.?
- With Bhutto’s murder and Musharraf’s departure, the crisis in Mumbai drew Pakistani forces to the Indian border and away from the western tribal region. Was that the geostrategic goal of these well-timed crises? What role, if any, did Israel play?
- Is delay in ending the occupation of Palestine part of an agent provocateur strategy? Was the latest assault on Gaza part of this strategy?
Each of these crises incrementally advanced the expansionist agenda of Colonial Zionists. Do these collateral incidents trace their origin to a common source? Is that source again using serial events to pre-stage a main event?
The public has an intuitive grasp of the source of this oft-recurring behavior. An October 2003 poll of 7,500 respondents in member nations of the European Union found that Israel was considered the greatest threat to world peace.
Is terrorism limited to “Islamo-fascists”? Are mass murders also deployed—from the shadows—as a strategy of geopolitical manipulation by those who Ashkenazim philosopher Hannah Arendt described as “Jewish fascists”?
Britain is probably the “mark” intended for destabilization. Thanks for a clearer view on what’s happening in South Asia. I’d like to bring to your attention a probable expansion on Israel’s goals using B.H. Liddell Hart’s “game theories.” Hart wrote the book entitled: STRATEGY. It’s a classic in Military Science and was carried by Israeli military leaders during some of its wars during the past 30+ years. In it, Hart states (to paraphrase) that the weaker side in a conflict in which it is pitted against a stronger side that consists of a coalition, must attack the weaker members of the coalition before directly taking on the strongest member – contrary to popular opinion.
In Afghanistan, the U.S. is the stronger member of the alliance and Britain is its junior partner. In N.A.T.O. it’s the same situation. Following Military Science, weakening Britain in Afghanistan before focusing on the U.S. is the best strategy for the Taliban and El Qaida and also for weakening N.A.T.O. But, it’s more than that and probably not part of Russia’s or China’s strategy.
Guess who will replace Britain if it fails to pull its weight. That’s right – Israel. In that case, Israel would have the backing of the U.S. and N.A.T.O. to use its military outside its borders, especially in the Middle East and South Asia. Observe the affects of the attacks on British forces in Afghanistan in relation to the other members of the coalition and Britain’s commitment to continuing as America’s most important military partner in the region. I think the Taliban and Al Qeida are receiving expert military advise that includes applying Hart’s principals in Afghanistan that have more than regional implications and involve much more than just controlling oil and opium or even a Greater Israel.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
November 11th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Thanks for this. Appreciate you taking the time to contribute a value-adding comment.
[Reply]
“Little was said about the Israeli interest in a pipeline across Georgia meant to move Caspian oil through Turkey and on to Eurasia, using Israel as an intermediary while undermining Russia’s oil industry.”
Is the point above that Russia was the aggressor and provoked Georgia so that Russia could interfere with the Georgian pipeline? Or does it suggest that Israel urged Georgia to attack S. Ossetia and needlessly jeopardized the existing Georgian pipeline?
It seems that the mere presence of a pipeline is supposed to mean something all on its own even though pipelines are fairly ubiquitous.
In any event Russia clearly prevailed militarily and left the Georgian pipeline in place anyhow and even if Georgia had prevailed it would not have altered the security or control of the pipeline.
[Reply]
After the death of the leader of Pakistan movement Quaid-e-Azam in 1948 – westernized Pakistani elite choose American block while India went under USSR protection, but maintained a secret defence agreement (1958) with the US. India recognized Zionist entity in 1950, however, diplomatic relations were not established until 1992 – in order to counter Pakistan’s influence in the Arab world.
Military cooperation between India and Israel began during Indira Gandhi. She created the spy agency RAW in 1968 and ordered its director R.N. Kao to seek training from Mossad. During 1960s political violence in Pakistan which resulted in India’s military invasion of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), RAW and Mossad teamed up while western mainstream media ran an anti-Pakistan campaign and the western Jewish lobby groups supported Bengali separatists.
In 2006, George Bush and Dr. Manmohan Singh signed a nuclear cooperation agreement, which did not bother Zionist entity or Jewish Lobby – as Iran’s non-existent nuclear bomb does.
On January 21, 2008, India launched Israeli spy sattelite Polaris via an Indian space rocket at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre.
On February 18, 2008 – India’s giant Tata Industries signed a cooperation agreement with Israel Aerospace Industries.
Hindu extremists in league with RAW, Mossad, and CIA have been creating false-flage operations in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan – blaming them on Muslim groups supporting Kashmiri resistance or the phony Al-Qaeda in Swat and Waziristan. Last year’s carnage in Mumbai was work of CIA-RAW-Mossad, which was blamed on Pakistan. The same trio was behind shooting at Sri Lankan Cricket Team, bombing at Marriot Hotel (Islamabad) and Indian Embassy in Kabul……..
American-Indian-Israeli Axis
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/american-indian-israeli-axis-2/
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
November 12th, 2009 at 3:42 am
Thanks very much for this comment. Much appreciate you taking the time.
[Reply]
Dear Jeff,
An encouraging article, and it has to be noted here, that Paktribune has been publishing articles based on this evil troika relationship for sometime now.
History has always taught us, that \evil\ always has a bad ending, & it will continue as long as there is a supreme power – Almighty God. That \evil\ cannot prevail & it will be quashed. This holds true, as Pakistan has long been a good ally of the United States. Ordinary US citizens even love us. We don’t hate US citizens, we hate the American foreign policy & the bias it has.
The mistrust that the government holds, mostly because of the Jewish lobby, and partly because of Hindu nexism, will be toxic for this entire region, & as well as USA. United States has a deep recession, and it is clearly not out of troubled waters, yet its mainstream media continues to talk war with Iran. It will lead to catastrophic results.
If neighbor India continues like this, remember that Pakistan is no Afghanistan or Iraq, it will strike back, and that strike will be heard worldover.
[Reply]
Here is on USrael’s conspiracies against the only Muslim nuclear power.
Eretz Balochistan
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/eretz-balochistan/
[Reply]
I personally am of the opinion that all religious communities in Palestine have a right to exist. But what Israel has done there is pure fascism. The way it bombarded the localities in Lebanon, and on Ghaza belt in the past and in recent months in Palestine itself, many times shelling young kids with mortars and bombs, brutally killing those innocent kids, makes one feel the Jewish media perhaps concocted that theory of Holocaust, because what Zionist lobby in Israel has done to Arabs, may be Nazis could not do to the Jews. Had this not been the case, not a single Jew could have escaped to the US or to the western countries in Europe.
Unfortunately US now has started moving all along the Zionist policies to surge ahead (a marriage of fascist convenience between these three players in the Eurasian Game plan i.e. India, US and Israel).
But these policies, in no way are helping minimize the militancy. What they are doing induces even neutral and secular minded Pakistanis too get more Islamized. An attitude which was fully demonstrated and evidenced during a closed session the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had with students and teachers at a meeting in Lahore.
Dr. Nayyar Hashmey
http://wondersofpakistan.wordpress.com/
or
http://wondersofpakistan.blogspot.com/
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
January 9th, 2010 at 12:46 am
Thanks for taking the time to write your insightful comment. I hope that you will keep a close eye on OpinionMaker.com, a popular Paksitani site where I’ve just published a sever-part series that may well be of interest to those who visit your site. Again, many thanks. And please let your colleagues know about Guilt By Association, the first release in the Criminal State series.
[Reply]
“History always repeats itself. But who will teach this history to the American people when Zionists control the information industry? The Zionist Mafia and their ass-kissing careerist henchmen in media, government academia, and business have all the bases covered.” Dr. Albert D. Pastore PhD in An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and the War on Terrorism. Now, in that context consider the possible role of CIA/Mossad in the case five American arrested last week in Pakistan in an attempt to blow-up country’s Chashma nuclear plant.
Kamal Azfar, former Governor of Sindh province and a confidant of the founder of Pakistan’s ruling party PPP, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (father-in-law of President Asif Ali Zardari), in a recent interview with daily Nation said: “The troika of spy agencies of US, Israel and India seem to have joined hands and is working covertly through invisible forces not only to destablize Pakistan but to subvert Pakistan’s nuclear capability…….
Zionist Troika against Pakistan
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/zionist-troika-against-pakistan/
[Reply]
israel is not a nation or state but a small group of terrorists supported and funded by U.S.A., north america (Canada) and Russian.
but in my point of view Pakistan and Israel are facing same problems in their regions
1.First when Israel appeared on the map of the world, most of the countries (including all islamic and some non-islamic countries) did not accept them and created many problems for the Jewish state. In Pakistan case, India and even our Muslim brother Afghanistan did not accept Pakistan. (In 1947 China not in map of world).
2.Both states are colonies of U.K before 1947 and after the end of world war two U.K decided to withdraw this right from these colonies. And so in 1947 the Islamic idelogical states apper in world map (14Aug). In same year, Jews idelogical state appeared in the world map.
3.Third and most important point is both states need to keep nuclear weapons to protect their states from their neighbour countries.
“There was many comparisons beteen two countries but main point is Jews also have right to keep their separate state in middal east as Indian muslims have to make their state in sub-continent. My personal advice to Israeli people is to wihtdraw their army from all the arab areas and accept Palestine as state and make to peace with Pakistan and countries and i see in future Israel should accept Palestine as an Islamic state.”
[Reply]