Criminal State
Criminal State, Front Page, Israel lobby, Politics

Tel Aviv, Peace and the Obama Prize

October 13, 2009 by · 5 Comments 

1(2838)

The Nobel Committee again piqued the interest of those who marvel at the impact of an annual ritual of global branding that in 1973 labeled Henry Kissinger a peace laureate! As with many aspects of unconventional warfare, what emerges in the foreground often obscures behavior that remains concealed in the background.

Anyone paying attention knows that pro-Israelis manipulated the intelligence that induced the U.S. to invade Iraq. That same source is now hoping to expand this war to Iran—without being detected. In an irony of epic proportions, this award may enable that deceit.

Pundits charge that Barack Obama was given the 2009 peace prize for Not Being Bush. The Nobel Committee cited Obama’s multilateralism in contrast to Bush’s unilateralism. Yet the same pro-Israeli networks that deployed phony intelligence to manipulate decision-making in the Bush presidency remain active inside the Obama presidency. At least Bush had the mass murder of 9-11 to rationalize his choices.

The manipulation of consensus beliefs discredited the U.S. when it went to war on fixed intelligence. A similar mental manipulation generated consensus support for trade and financial policies that systematically devastated the U.S. economy. The challenge for Tel Aviv is how best to continue its agenda for Greater Israel now that the manipulation of public opinion has grown more transparent—and when entire communities, reeling from the impact of massive financial frauds, are aware that something fundamental is amiss.

Those consensus-enabled frauds include the savings and loan bust of the 1980s, the dotcom crash of 2000 and the recent subprime mortgage meltdown with its massive bailout of Wall Street’s financial elite. In the mid-1990s, a similar consensus-enabled fraud impoverished tens of millions of Russians while leaving a legacy of oligarchs in its wake.

In a nation whose population, like the U.S., is less than two percent Ashkenazim, six of Russia’s seven richest oligarchs (84%) qualify for Israeli citizenship. Similarly, a list of the top 50 neoconservatives advocating war in Iraq reveals 26 (52%) who are Jewish. Likewise a review of Nobel laureates in economic science confirms that the awards largely honor Ashkenazi “Chicago School” economists.

As financial freedom emerged—by consensus—as a proxy for human freedom, this “Chicago” mindset created oligarchies worldwide, undermining both democracies and markets. The model’s fixation on money, since branded the “Washington” consensus, gained global traction as its advocates were lionized as Nobel laureates—discrediting the U.S. in the process.

Obscuring a Criminal State

Consensus beliefs explain how frauds can progress in plain sight as faith-based psy-ops displace facts with what a targeted public can be deceived to accept as true. Deception works the same regardless whether the fraud is a shared belief in Iraqi weapons of mass destruction or a consensus faith in the infallibility of unfettered financial markets. The only modern aspect of this ancient craft is the technological means to defraud on a global scale.

For consensus frauds to become systemic requires lengthy pre-staging and political cooperation. Once a long-deceived public grasps the duplicity at the heart of this mental and emotional manipulation, they will see for themselves its common source—which brings us to this latest Nobel peace prize.

Though Barack Obama conceded he did not deserve it, that misses the point. The primary national security issue he now faces is what strategy to pursue in the quagmire of Afghanistan. His senior military advisers recommend a troop surge to create the stability required for a drawdown of forces.

Others urge a speedy withdrawal. That strategy would leave in place the forces that will reconstitute the Taliban and provide a haven for Al Qaeda there and in neighboring Pakistan. This peace prize complicates the option to escalate. That may well be its purpose.

A quick withdrawal would also help pre-stage a consensus that the next Evil Doer comes from this region. Plus Afghanistan and Pakistan provide a plausible source of serial crises to deflect attention from resolving Israel’s brutal six-decade occupation of Palestine. Thus the enthusiasm for Obama’s award from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

To date, the U.S. has lost ground in every negotiation with this Israeli leader. The issue of settlements was relegated to background noise. At U.S. urging, the U.N. deferred consideration of the Goldstone Report on Gaza despite facts confirming dozens of Israeli war crimes. By pressuring a Palestinian leader to endorse deferral, U.S. diplomats further undermined the prospects for peace. Meanwhile, Jewish extremists are fueling the hostilities required for a third Intifada.

Branding an Asset

With the expansionist goals of Greater Israel yet to be fulfilled, Tel Aviv needs a U.S. president perceived as a mediator akin to peace laureate Mother Teresa. For a laureate to escalate a war conflicts with the Nobel brand. Obama the Peacemaker can now justify the rapid withdrawal sought by pro-Israelis, his political base and Norwegian peaceniks.

In return, he can be portrayed as heroic—for advancing their agenda. Meanwhile Israel can justify a unilateral preemptive attack on Iran using U.S.-provided bunker-buster bombs, plausibly citing self-defense now that the Peace President is conflicted. That attack will ensure the crises required to help obscure the common source of this systemic criminality. Should the U.S. military object, critics can point to a recent record of dissent on troop strength in Afghanistan and on a policy shift on gays in the military.

Any attack in the U.S. or the E.U. will be blamed on crises in the Middle East, enabling critics to charge that Obama capitulated to Europeans who embrace peace at any price. Though Obama is now being lionized, he will then be demonized. The result will discredit his presidency, endanger the U.S. and pave the way for a more militant successor, a strategic victory for Tel Aviv as the next presidency is likewise staffed with Zionists and pro-Israelis.

Barack Obama is a political product of Chicago Ashkenazim who trace directly to Jewish organized crime of the 1920s. This prize may embolden a trans-generational criminal syndicate for whom peace is an obstacle to the perpetual warfare required to advance Colonial Zionist goals.

This award was announced soon after Obama described Israel as “the Jewish state.” That code phrase outraged Muslims worldwide, particularly those whose lands are occupied by an apartheid government. Only America’s first African-American president could endorse racist policies certain to push the parties closer to war. Instead of being denounced, he was awarded a Nobel peace prize.

This award is welcome news for a global syndicate scrambling to obscure the common source of the manipulated beliefs that induced war in Iraq—and the common source of the consensus beliefs that enabled financial frauds in the U.S., Russia and worldwide.

To a dispirited public looking for hope, has this Chicagoan been positioned to raise those hopes only to dash them? The facts suggest that this inexperienced commander-in-chief has unwittingly allowed his office to be manipulated by those who mean to make a bad situation worse—possibly far worse.

How can any nation trust that U.S. policy is crafted in Washington and not Tel Aviv? Barack Obama could concede that those who produced his political career are the source of this consensus manipulation. Only with that concession will this prize become deserved.

Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association, Democracy at Risk and The Ownership Solution. See www.criminalstate.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • WordPress

Comments

5 Responses to “Tel Aviv, Peace and the Obama Prize”
  1. C. A. says:

    Obama is a usurper just like the Israeli’s are usurpers. Obama does not deserve a Nobel peace prize, but we all should know jews control that also. Jews control about everything, and unless american’s wake up and cut the ties with this criminal regime, there will never be peace. Israeli jews have kept america involved in war after war, all for their benefit. They are back stabbers who shoot our troops in the back with their snippers, and cannot be trusted around american troops because they are murdering them, and making it look like arabs etc, are doing it. They pull false flag operations like clock work. America’s leadership, both politically, and religiously have been duped by the devil himself.
    http://judicial-inc.biz/Israel_in_Iraq.htm

    http://judicial-inc.biz/Marine_female_ambush_1.htm

    http://judicial-inc.biz/Mercs_ambush_marines.htm

    http://judicial-inc.biz/FalseFlag.htm

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/blackops.html

    [Reply]

    Webmaster Reply:

    Thanks for your comment. It’s essential in identifying the source of this duplicity that one neither overstate nor understate the common source of the deception to which we’ve been subjected. Many moderate and secular Jews are appalled by this treachery and concerned that, simply by being Jewish, they could be portrayed as guilty by association. Similarly, Mormons (aka the Lost Tribe of Israel) are found at the heart of this duplicity yet many within the broader community are unaware of how their beliefs have been manipulated. Likewise for the Christian Right or the Islamic Right. The issue is extremism and the premeditated displacement of the facts essential for informed choice with what a targeted population can be deceived to believe. Keep in mind that Judaism is the core from which the two derivative beliefs emerged: Christianity and Islam. Thus it makes sense that particular brand of faith-based duplicity would have more experience in manipulating behavior through the manipulation of thought and emotion. At the core of this phenomenon is organized crime now operating transnationally. To take organized crime to global scale required a so-called “state” through which to operate. No surprise that recognition was extended by a Christian-Zionist president who was manipulated by those chronicled in these accounts. The only aspect of this ancient modus operandi that is modern is the means with which deceit can operate on a genuinely global scale. Thus the dominance of this transnational network in media and popular culture. I understand the frustration you and others feel. This problem can now be solved provided those working to solve it remain coldly factual and never step beyond the facts required to hold those complicit accountable.

    [Reply]

  2. Rehmat says:

    On October 9 – Barack Obama beat the other two US presidents who received Nobel Peace Prize just being in the White House womb for nine months without achieving peace in any of the foreign lands occupied by the US or its Zionist allies. The other two Presidents who received Nobel Peace Prize while waging wars for corporate lobby groups – were Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt. What Obama and Roosevelt has common in addition to Nobel Prize – is that both have Jewish blood – though Zionists like us to believe that Iranian President Ahmadinejad, too, has Jewish roots.

    The other US Presidents, who did not receive the coveted prize -but are rumoured to be Jewish – include Abraham Lincoln (son of Nancy Hakenburger), Franklin D. Roosevelt (son of Dutch Jewish family by the name Rosefelt), Harry Truman, Eisenhower (son of a Swedish Jewish family), Lyndon Johnson, Bushes (good Nazi connections), etc.

    Hebrew media did boast that it were Jews who put Obama in the White House and that “he is one of us”. Henry Makow PhD, a Canadian academic, in his October 7 article titled “Obama’s Jewish Grandfather” wrote that Barack Husein Obama’s maternal grandfather, Stanely Dunhum, was Jewish. He also repeat his earlier allegations that Hitler’s grandmother was also Jewish (a Rothschild)……

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/obama-nobel-prize-but-no-peace/

    [Reply]

  3. In his congratulatory message to President Obama upon being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, Israeli President Shimon Peres stated:

    “Very few leaders if at all were able to change the mood of the entire world in such a short while with such profound impact. You provided all of humanity with fresh hope, with intellectual determination, and a feeling that there is a Lord in heaven and believers on earth. Under your leadership, peace became a real and original agenda. And from Jerusalem, I am sure all the bells of engagement and understanding will ring again. You gave us a license to dream and act in a noble direction.” [1]

    Within days of the announcement for 2009’s Nobel Peace Prize, twenty-two time nominee, Mordechai Vanunu declined the honor in a letter to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Oslo:

    “I am asking the committee to remove my name from the nominations…I cannot be part of a list of laureates that includes Simon Peres…Peres established and developed the atomic weapon program in Dimona in Israel…Peres was the man who ordered [my] kidnapping…he continues to oppose my freedom and release…WHAT I WANT IS FREEDOM AND ONLY FREEDOM….FREEDOM AND ONLY FREEDOM I NEED NOW.” [2]

    In 1994, Yitzhak Rabin, Yasser Arafat and Peres were all awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for playing a part in achieving the Oslo Declaration of Principles. According to the preamble of the DOP, peace was to be based on mutual respect and reconciliation.

    Alfred Nobel’s intention was to reward people with a moral backbone and he hoped to create icons and examples to humankind. Here’s hoping President Obama seizes his Nobel Prize as a mandate from Oslo and also hold Israel accountable for past sins of omission and obfuscations.

    In 1963, when Vanunu was nine years old the Zionists came to his home town of Marrakech, Morocco and convinced his Orthodox father to abandon his general store and pack up the first seven of his eleven children for the land of milk and honey. Instead, the Vanunu’s were banished to the desert of Beesheva. A few months later, Shimon Peres, then Israel’s Deputy Minister of Defense met with President John Kennedy, at the White House.

    Kennedy told Peres, “You know that we follow very closely the discovery of any nuclear development in the region. This could create a very dangerous situation. For this reason we monitor your nuclear effort. What could you tell me about this?”

    Peres replied, “I can tell you most clearly that we will not introduce nuclear weapons to the region, and certainly we will not be the first.”

    Ghassan Khatib, a spokesman for the Palestinian Authority, said Palestinians hope the prize “will provide an additional incentive” for Obama to keep striving for an end to the decades-old conflict while Reuven Rivlin, speaker of Israel’s parliament, called the Nobel decision “very strange.” [3]

    The Nobel committee “stressed that it made its decision based on Mr. Obama’s actual efforts toward nuclear disarmament as well as American engagement with the world relying more on diplomacy and dialogue.” [4]

    President Obama, is now the third sitting American president to win the award, and his peers include Mikhail S. Gorbachev, who won the Nobel for helping end the Cold War which raged from 1945 to 1991, and Nelson Mandela, who fought for the end of Apartheid in South Africa.

    Instead of repenting and abolishing nuclear weapons after the terrorism inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the American government upped the ante of nuclear insanity and thus bears the most responsibility for the political conflict and economic competition that ensued during those 46 years.

    The apartheid regime in South Africa existed from 1948 until 1994; but it was not until the late 1980′s that the American government got on-board with the over twenty years of a global call for boycott, divestment and sanctions that finally brought that apartheid system to its knees.

    The Norwegians are way ahead of US in regards to people power and human rights activism for justice in Israel Palestine.

    The Norwegian government dropped the Israeli firm Elbit Systems Ltd. from the government pension fund, because regular people brought to the attention of their government Elbit’s involvement in building the Apartheid Wall in the Occupied West Bank.

    “Norway’s Council of Ethics cited the 2004 International Court of Justice ruling that declared the Separation Wall to be illegal. Elbit Systems supplies essential components for the building of the Wall, including surveillance technology, and is also a manufacturer of weapons used to sustain Israel’s Occupation of Palestine… [and] because of the firm’s material support for the illegal Occupation and crimes against the Palestinian people… [and because they] supplied arms to Israel in the full knowledge that these weapons would be used against civilians in Palestine and Lebanon.” [5]

    On October 2, 2009, The Washington Times reported that “Obama agrees to keep Israel’s nukes secret [and] reaffirmed a 4-decade-old secret understanding that has allowed Israel to keep a nuclear arsenal without opening it to international inspections.”

    In 2005, Vanunu, told me:

    “President Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building atomic weapons. Prime Minister Ben Guirion said, ‘The nuclear reactor is only for peace.”

    “Kennedy insisted on an open internal inspection. He wrote letters demanding that Ben Guirion open up the Dimona for inspection.

    “When Johnson became president, he made an agreement with Israel that two senators would come every year to inspect. Before the senators would visit, the Israelis would build a wall to block the underground elevators and stairways. From 1963 to ’69, the senators came, but they never knew about the wall that hid the rest of the Dimona from them.

    “Nixon stopped the inspections and agreed to ignore the situation. As a result, Israel increased production. In 1986, there were over two hundred bombs. Today, they may have enough plutonium for ten bombs a year.”

    On April 5, 2009, President Obama stood on the world stage in Prague and admitted, “As the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act…When we fail to pursue peace, then it stays forever beyond our grasp. We know the path when we choose fear over hope. To denounce or shrug off a call for cooperation is an easy but also cowardly thing to do. That’s how wars begin. That’s where human progress ends…the voices of peace and progress must be raised together…Human destiny will be what we make of it…Words must mean something.”

    1.http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1254861908462

    2.http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1216&Itemid=218

    3. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-obama-nobel-israel10-2009oct10,0,6389213.story

    4. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/world/10nobel.html?th&emc=th

    5. http://www.waronwant.org/news/latest-news/16659-victory-for-bds-campaign-as-arms-firm-axed

    [Reply]

  4. Rehmat says:

    Jewish lobby groups know how to pressure US president to lick their feet. In Obama’s case – he has the record lowest popularity rating of any former US president (6%), while 64% of American Jews agree with his policies towards the occupied Muslim world – though it has dropped from 77-78% during November 2008 election.

    In his appreciation of Jewish support at home – Obama and his wife are throwing a Hanukkah party for 550 Jew and Zionist elites on December 16, 2009…..

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/12/12/obamas-hanukkah-party/

    [Reply]

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Criminal State