Comments on: Nuke Gaza http://criminalstate.com/2009/10/nuke-gaza/ Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:08:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Chris Moore http://criminalstate.com/2009/10/nuke-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-1031 Chris Moore Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:58:32 +0000 http://criminalstate.com/?p=309#comment-1031 Gates wrote: "Who, other than the Israelis, could have mounted such an intelligence operation inside the U.s., including the lengthy pre-staging required inside the U.S.? How long beforehand did Richard Perle & Co. develop Iraqi asset Ahmed Chalabi to provide the fixed intelligence reported in The New York Times by Judith Miller?" People like Perle, Miller and Doug Feith seem to exist with one foot in America and one foot in Israel. Just read this profile of Feith. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith How does a guy like this end up in such a sensitive position, and get away with fabricating the intelligence that took us to war in Iraq? I think the US war-profiteering complex, the Zionist complex, and their tentacles, and their wholly owned politicians have a tacit agreement with the Israelis that staunch Jewish American Zionists will be utilized in sensitive, high level positions in order to incite wars for profit and for Israel. Why is Rahm Emanuel, no less a Zionist than Feith, in the position he's currently in? Gates wrote: “Who, other than the Israelis, could have mounted such an intelligence operation inside the U.s., including the lengthy pre-staging required inside the U.S.? How long beforehand did Richard Perle & Co. develop Iraqi asset Ahmed Chalabi to provide the fixed intelligence reported in The New York Times by Judith Miller?”

People like Perle, Miller and Doug Feith seem to exist with one foot in America and one foot in Israel. Just read this profile of Feith.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Douglas_J._Feith
How does a guy like this end up in such a sensitive position, and get away with fabricating the intelligence that took us to war in Iraq?

I think the US war-profiteering complex, the Zionist complex, and their tentacles, and their wholly owned politicians have a tacit agreement with the Israelis that staunch Jewish American Zionists will be utilized in sensitive, high level positions in order to incite wars for profit and for Israel.

Why is Rahm Emanuel, no less a Zionist than Feith, in the position he’s currently in?

]]> By: Jeff Gates http://criminalstate.com/2009/10/nuke-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-1025 Jeff Gates Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:41:19 +0000 http://criminalstate.com/?p=309#comment-1025 Thanks. The real point is <em>why</em> the 9-11 Commission did not take testimony on the motivation for that mass murder. The chair and vice-chair claim they were prevented by other members of the Commission. What sort of leadership is that? Plus testimony was not taken from at least one key witness who met with the Ph.D. nuclear physicist who oversaw an industrial division that included Iraq's mothballed nuclear program. Why call more than 1200 witnesses and not this person? Look behind the confession and consider who had the means, motivation, opportunity and, importantly, the stable nation state intelligence required to foist such a wall-to-wall deception on U.S. decision-makers? Looking back, the modus operandi is clear: somehow we were induced to war by those who displaced facts with what we could be deceived to believe: Iraqi WMD, Iraqi meetings in Prague, Iragi mobile biological weapons laboratories, Iraqi purchases of yellowcake uranium for Niger, Iraqi high-level meetings with the Taliban. None of it was true. None of it. Who, other than the Israelis, could have mounted such an intelligence operation inside the U.s., including the lengthy pre-staging required <em>inside the U.S.</em>? How long beforehand did Richard Perle & Co. develop Iraqi asset Ahmed Chalabi to provide the fixed intelligence reported in <em>The New York Times</em> by Judith Miller? Thanks. The real point is why the 9-11 Commission did not take testimony on the motivation for that mass murder. The chair and vice-chair claim they were prevented by other members of the Commission. What sort of leadership is that? Plus testimony was not taken from at least one key witness who met with the Ph.D. nuclear physicist who oversaw an industrial division that included Iraq’s mothballed nuclear program. Why call more than 1200 witnesses and not this person? Look behind the confession and consider who had the means, motivation, opportunity and, importantly, the stable nation state intelligence required to foist such a wall-to-wall deception on U.S. decision-makers? Looking back, the modus operandi is clear: somehow we were induced to war by those who displaced facts with what we could be deceived to believe: Iraqi WMD, Iraqi meetings in Prague, Iragi mobile biological weapons laboratories, Iraqi purchases of yellowcake uranium for Niger, Iraqi high-level meetings with the Taliban. None of it was true. None of it. Who, other than the Israelis, could have mounted such an intelligence operation inside the U.s., including the lengthy pre-staging required inside the U.S.? How long beforehand did Richard Perle & Co. develop Iraqi asset Ahmed Chalabi to provide the fixed intelligence reported in The New York Times by Judith Miller?

]]> By: Atheo http://criminalstate.com/2009/10/nuke-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-1024 Atheo Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:31:26 +0000 http://criminalstate.com/?p=309#comment-1024 "Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, the confessed mastermind of the mass murder of 9-11, conceded that the motivation..." Um... shouldn't we note that the "confession" was gotten through torture? Is that type of "information" really such a strong evidence to use in establishing a position? It seems like the weakest link. “Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, the confessed mastermind of the mass murder of 9-11, conceded that the motivation…”

Um… shouldn’t we note that the “confession” was gotten through torture? Is that type of “information” really such a strong evidence to use in establishing a position? It seems like the weakest link.

]]>