Criminal State, Front Page, Israel lobby
What Role Did the U.S.-Israeli Relationship Play in 9-11?
September 11, 2009 by Jeff Gates · 22 Comments
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: “It’s very good….Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel).”
Intelligence wars rely on mathematical models to anticipate the response of “the mark” to staged provocations. Reactions thereby become foreseeable—within an acceptable range of probabilities. When Israeli mathematician Robert J. Aumann received the 2005 Nobel Prize in economic science, he conceded that “the entire school of thought that we have developed here in Israel” has turned “Israel into the leading authority in this field.”
With a well-planned provocation, the anticipated response can even become a weapon in the arsenal of the agent provocateur. In response to 9-11, how difficult would it be to foresee that the U.S. would deploy its military to avenge that attack? With fixed intelligence, how difficult would it be to redirect that response to wage a long-planned war in Iraq — not for U.S. interests but to advance the agenda for Greater Israel?
The emotionally wrenching component of a provocation plays a key role in the field of game theory war planning where Israel is the authority. With the televised murder of 3,000 Americans, a shared mindset of shock, grief and outrage made it easier for U.S. policy-makers to believe that a known Evil Doer in Iraq was responsible, regardless of the facts.
The strategic displacement of facts with induced beliefs, in turn, requires a period of “preparing the mindset” so that “the mark” will put their faith in a pre-staged fiction. Those who induced the March 2003 invasion of Iraq began “laying mental threads” and creating agenda-advancing mental associations more than a decade earlier.
Notable among those threads was the 1993 publication in Foreign Affairs of an article by Harvard professor Samuel Huntington. By the time his analysis appeared in book-length form in 1996 as The Clash of Civilizations, more than 100 academies and think tanks were prepared to promote it, pre-staging a “clash consensus”–five years before 9-11.
Also published in 1996 under the guidance of Richard Perle was A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (i.e., Israel). A member since 1987 of the U.S. Defense Policy Advisory Board, this self-professed Zionist became its chairman in 2001. As a key adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Perle’s senior Pentagon post helped lay the required foundation for removing Saddam Hussein as part of a Greater Israel strategy, a key theme of A Clean Break – released five years before 9-11.
A mass murder, articles, books, think tanks and Pentagon insiders, however, are not enough to manage the variables in a “probabilistic” war-planning model. Supportive policy makers are also required to lend the appearance of legitimacy and credibility to an operation justified by intelligence fixed around a pre-determined agenda.
That role was eagerly filled by Senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, a Jewish Zionist from Connecticut, and Jon Kyl, a Christian Zionist from Arizona, when they co-sponsored the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. Echoing Tel Aviv’s agenda in A Clean Break, their bill laid another mental thread in the public mindset by calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein–three years before 9-11.
The legislation also appropriated $97 million, largely to promote that Zionist agenda. Distracted by mid-term Congressional elections and by impeachment proceedings commenced in reaction to a well-timed presidential affair involving White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton signed that agenda into law October 31, 1998 — five years before the U.S.-led invasion that removed Saddam Hussein.
After 9-11, John McCain and Joe Lieberman became inseparable travel companions and irrepressible advocates for the invasion of Iraq. Looking “presidential” aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in January 2002, McCain laid another key thread when he waved an admiral’s cap while proclaiming, alongside Lieberman, “On to Baghdad.”
By Way of Deception
The chutzpah with which this game theory strategy progressed in plain sight could be seen in the behavior of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, another Zionist insider. Four days after 9-11, in a principals’ meeting at Camp David, he proposed that the U.S. invade Iraq. At that time, the intelligence did not yet point to Iraqi involvement and Osama bin Laden was thought to be hiding in a remote region of Afghanistan.
Frustrated that President George H.W. Bush declined to remove Saddam Hussein during the 1991 Gulf War, Wolfowitz proposed a No-Fly Zone in northern Iraq. By 2001, the Israeli Mossad had agents at work for a decade in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. Intelligence reports of Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda also came from Mosul — reports that later proved to be false. Mosul again emerged in November 2004 as a center of the insurgency that destabilized Iraq. That reaction precluded the speedy exit of coalition forces promised in Congressional testimony by senior war-planner Wolfowitz.
The common source of the fixed intelligence that induced America to war in Iraq has yet to be acknowledged even though intelligence experts agree that deception on such a scale required a decade to plan, staff, pre-stage, orchestrate and, to date, cover up. The two leaders of the 9-11 Commission report conceded they were stopped by Commission members from hearing testimony on the motivation for 9-11: the U.S.-Israeli relationship.
The fictions accepted as generally accepted truths included Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague, Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories and Iraqi purchases of “yellowcake” uranium from Niger. Only the last fact was conceded as phony in the relevant time frame. All the rest were disclosed as false, flawed or fixed only after the war began. An attempt to cover-up the yellowcake account led to the federal prosecution of vice-presidential chief of staff Lewis Libby, another well-placed Zionist insider.
Did game theory-modeled pre-staging also include the Israeli provocation that led to the Second Intifada? An intifada is an uprising or, literally, a “shaking off” of an oppressor. The Second Intifada in Palestine dates from September 2000 when Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon led an armed march to Jerusalem’s Temple Mount – one year before 9-11.
After a year of calm—during which Palestinians believed in the prospects for peace—suicide bombings recommenced after this high-profile provocation. In response to the uprising, Sharon and Netanyahu observed that only when Americans “feel our pain” would they understand the plight of the victimized Israelis. Both Israeli leaders suggested that shared mindset (“feel our pain”) would require in the U.S. a weighted body count of 4,500 to 5,000 Americans lost to terrorism, the initial estimate of those who died in the twin towers of New York City’s World Trade Center—one year later.
The American Valkyrie?
When successful, game theory warfare strengthens the agent provocateur while leaving the mark discredited and depleted by the anticipated reaction to a well-timed provocation. By game theory standards, 9-11 was a strategic success because the U.S. was portrayed as irrational for its reaction — the invasion of Iraq – that triggered a deadly insurgency with devastating consequences both for Iraq and the U.S.
That insurgency, in turn, was an easily modeled reaction to the invasion of a nation that (a) played no role in the provocation, and (b) was known to be populated by three long-warring sects where an unstable peace was maintained by a former U.S. ally who was rebranded an Evil Doer. As the cost in blood and treasure expanded, the U.S. became overextended militarily, financially and diplomatically.
As “the mark” (the U.S.) emerged in the foreground, the agent provocateur faded into the background. But only after catalyzing dynamics that steadily drained the U.S. of credibility, resources and resolve. This “probabilistic” victory also ensured widespread cynicism, insecurity, distrust and disillusionment along with a declining capacity to defend its interests due to the duplicity of a game theory-savvy enemy within.
Meanwhile the American public fell under a regime of oversight, surveillance and intimidation marketed as “homeland” security. This domestic operation even features rhetorical hints of a WWII “fatherland” with clear signs of a force alien to the U.S. with its welcome embrace of open dissent. Is this operation meant to protect Americans or to shield those responsible for this insider operation from Americans?
By manipulating the shared mindset, skilled game theory war-planners can wage battles in plain sight and on multiple fronts with minimal resources. One proven strategy: Pose as an ally of a well-armed nation predisposed to deploy its military in response to a mass murder. In this case, the result destabilized Iraq, creating crises that could be exploited to strategic advantage by expanding the conflict to Iran, another key Israeli goal announced in A Clean Break—seven years before the invasion of Iraq.
Which nation benefitted from the deployment of coalition forces to the region? Today’s mathematically model-able outcome undermined U.S. national security by overextending its military, discrediting its leadership, degrading its financial condition and disabling its political will. In game theory terms, these results were “perfectly predictable”—within an acceptable range of probabilities.
In the asymmetry that typifies today’s unconventional warfare, those who are few in numbers must wage war by way of deception—non-transparently and with means that leverage their impact. Which nation—if not Israel—fits that description?
Treason in Plain Sight?
Game theory war-planners manipulate the shared mental environment by shaping perceptions and creating impressions that become consensus opinions. With the aid of well-timed crises, policy-makers fall in line with a predetermined agenda—not because they are Evil Doers or “imperialists” but because the shared mindset has been pre-conditioned to respond not to the facts but to manipulated emotions and consensus beliefs. Without the murder of 3,000 on 9-11, America’s credibility would not now be damaged and the U.S. economy would be in far better shape.
By steadily displacing facts with what “the mark” can be induced to believe, the few-within-the-few amplify the impact of their duplicity. By steady manipulation of the public’s mindset, game theory war-planners can defeat an opponent with vastly superior resources by inducing those decisions that ensure defeat.
Intelligence wars are waged in plain sight and under the cover of widely shared beliefs. By manipulating consensus opinion, such wars can be won from the inside out by inducing a people to freely choose the very forces that imperil their freedom. Thus in the Information Age the disproportionate power wielded by those with outsized influence in media, pop culture, think tanks, academia and politics—domains where Zionist influence is most rampant.
Induced beliefs act as a force-multiplier to wage intelligence wars from the shadows. At the operational core of such warfare are those masterful at anticipating the mark’s response to a provocation and incorporating that response into their arsenal. For those who wage war in this fashion, facts are only a barrier to overcome. For those nations dependent on facts, the rule of law and informed consent to protect their freedom, such insider treachery poses the greatest possible threat to national security.
America is far less safe than before 9-11. Tel Aviv clearly intends to continue its serial provocations, as evidenced by its ongoing expansion of the settlements. Israel has shown no sign of a willingness to negotiate in good faith or to take the steps required to make peace a possibility. To date, Barack Obama appears unwilling to name senior appointees who are not either Zionists are strongly pro-Israeli. The greatest threat to world peace is not terrorists. The greatest threat is the U.S.-Israeli relationship.
In the same way that a decade of pre-staging was required to plausibly induce the U.S. to invade Iraq, a similar strategy is now underway to persuade the U.S. to invade Iran or to support and condone an attack by Israel. The same duplicity is again at work, including the high profile branding of the requisite Evil Doer. From its very outset, the Zionist enterprise focused on hegemony in the Middle East. Its entangled alliance with the U.S. enabled this enterprise to deploy American might for that purpose.
Only one nation had the means, motive, opportunity and stable nation state intelligence required to take the U.S. to war in the Middle East while also making it appear that Islam is the problem. If Barack Obama continues to defer to Tel Aviv, he can rightly be blamed when the next attack occurs in the U.S. or the European Union featuring the usual orgy of evidence pointing to a predetermined target. Should another mass murder occur, that event will be traceable directly to the U.S.-Israeli relationship and the failure of U.S policy-makers to free America from this enemy within.
See also:
How Israel Wages War in Plain Sight
Appeasing Israel – At What Cost?
I’ve been an avid “conspiracy buff” for a number of years, but was for a time subconsciously closed to information that pointed a firm finger at Israel or the “zionist” mindset more generally. Growing up in America, one is conditioned to believe that Jews are eternal victims, and that war and violence are inevitable and irrational facts of life. High school and university history classes were full of names, dates and slogans, but not principles.
As you suggest, Mr. Gates, the first principle of the situation is not “who” or “why” but “how”. The ideas of game theory, staged provocations, mass murder for political goals, etc. are so foreign to a person with conventional morality that (for me anyway) I really had to work through a lot of information to see the forest for the trees. It really does work this way – people that see “incompetence” or “human nature” where these conspiracies exist are simply not equipped with the principles that make the pieces fit perfectly.
Jesus warned his apostles to be “wise as serpents.” Acts like dropping atomic and incendiary bombs on cities of civilians, blowing up office towers full of people, throwing tens of millions into slave labor camps can’t be understood through ones’ own frame of reference. If one begins with the assumption that there are people on earth who have no moral constraints, one can begin to construct scenarios whereby those people could build the structure, institutions and relationships required for widespread control.
Mr. Gates, your materials fill in a massive piece of the puzzle not because they blame a certain culprit, but because they show how the game works. Once you understand that, the other pieces begin to fall into place and the culprits identify themselves. With so many winding paths in trying to figure out how the world works, you’ve paved a pretty smooth road.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 10:09 pm
Thanks for your kind comment. Profiling this trans-generational criminal syndicate has been akin to peering into what Joseph Conrad rightly called the heart of darkness. After the first two years (of now almost seven) of full-time research and analysis, I consulted the psychiatric literature for a definition of those whose behavior was consistent across time, space and distance. What I found “fits” the key perpetrators and should be mandatory reading for anyone hoping to help free ourselves from the webs of deceit woven by those described (note the descriptors in bold):
psychopathy n. A mental disorder roughly equivalent to antisocial personality disorder, but with emphasis on affective and interpersonal traits such as superficial charm, pathological lying, egocentricity, lack of remorse, and callousness that have traditionally been regarded by clinicians as characteristic of psychopaths, rather than social deviance traits such as need for stimulation, parasitic lifestyle, poor behavioral controls, impulsivity, and irresponsibility that are prototypical of antisocial personality disorder. Whether psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder share a common referent is an open question. Compare sociopathy. psychopath n.
[Reply]
Jeff I have taken a keen interest in your work, and I appreciate the academic approach you have taken in tackling these issues. However, it seems that you have followed the ‘offical’ version of events regarding the 9/11 attacks. Despite the constructed consensuses of what happened on 9/11 the academic evidence in terms of international relations theory, history and tangible facts suggests that 9/11 was not committed by Arabs in planes, but rather by US and Israeli elements.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Thanks very much for taking the time to comment. On this point, I urge that you review the introduction and the distinction between agents, assets and sayanim as it appears this operation involved a combination of all three.
[Reply]
Clear as a clean piece of glass. Thank you for making a murky situation so easy to understand.
[Reply]
These evil people will not rest until the see the clash of civilisation (between Christianity and Islam) has become a reality, following which they hope to emerge as the masters of the world, thereby achieving their real goal.
[Reply]
HI Jeff,
Nice work. Wish you’d given a bit more detail on Aumann and exactly how his work pertains to 9/11.
Would like to know your source for your statement:
Both Israeli leaders suggested that shared mindset (“feel our pain”) would require in the U.S. a weighted body count of 4,500 to 5,000 Americans lost to terrorism, the initial estimate of those who died in the twin towers of New York City’s World Trade Center—one year later.
Best wishes,
AT
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
September 21st, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Thanks for your comment and your inquiry. Game theory involves considerable modeling around expected outcomes. From the perspective of a serial agent provocateur known to wage war by way of deception, what was the outcome (“probabilistically”) of a mass murder on U.S. soil that could “plausibly” be linked to a Muslim nation in the Middle East? Could game theory war-planners have projected – within a reasonable range of probabilities — that the U.S. would deploy its military to avenge that mass murder? With sufficient pre-staging, how difficult would it be to redirect that deployment to a pursue a predetermined agenda in the region?
Colleagues tell me that the comments of Sharon and Netanyahu were widely reported in the European news pre-9/11 though the relevance only became clear much later.
[Reply]
On psychopaths,
Clearly some psychopaths are chosen by the syndicate specifically for these traits – most heads of state, media personalities, business leaders and others in public positions would need both charm and lack of remorse to do their jobs properly. But they serve an external agenda for the sake of their own egos and don’t wield much real power. Not to make this political, but Barack Obama seems to fit the profile to a T.
The thing I’d really like to know is who or what is at the “top of the pyramid” if there is such a thing, and what is the end goal? Either, the goal is “evil” – genocide, violence, confusion, etc, which can only be justified by some bizarre religious conviction or group psychosis, or the goal is “power,” which could be justified in terms of realpolitik. Watching Robert Macnamara in “The Fog of War” was a pretty clear example of someone who ordered mass murder because he rationalized that it was the best decision available – but he certainly didn’t seem to lose any sleep over it. Was he a psychopath?
When it comes to making a distinction between the “crime syndicate” and Israel / Jews, which concern drives the other? Does the goal of power / domination put religious fanatics in its service? Or does some apocalyptic religious cult create a power structure to enact its plot?
I’d really like to think it’s the former – which would explain 9/11 simply as a means toward the financial and political goals of British/Israeli/Saudi/US interests. In this case, I’d identify the “neocons” as the psychopaths, with people like Bill Kristol and Dick Cheney using political masks to hide an apocalyptic ideology. But like Hitler, the neocons wouldn’t have made it past paper without being employed by the real power interests – who consistently seem to be “investment bankers” like the Rothschilds, et al.
Although Israel is the predominant “cult” in the world, you can see how Mormonism, Scientology, and certain sects of Catholicism, Hinduism, Islam and even Buddhism (as in Tibet) are designed similarly, and play similar roles in recruiting true believers in the service of warfare. In that case, do the Rothschilds and other key interests in the crime syndicate wear Jewish masks simply so that unwitting Jews can be offered as a sacrifice every time the world catches on to the game?
And/or is Judaism or Jewish/Zionist culture fundamentally psychopathic? This gets into some weird areas, but is the real goal of the syndicate to bring evil into the world for a religious purpose? Are members of the syndicate themselves part of a group psychosis created through religious or cultural indoctrination? I think you could make an argument for this, as have people like Michael Hoffman, though I won’t attempt it here.
In either event, Israel needs to be exposed and neutralized. Let’s just hope they don’t bring the world down with them.
[Reply]
This is a superb and detailed analysis. Thank you Jeff for educating me and others on this issue.
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
September 21st, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Thanks for your comment. If you found this useful, others may also. Please pass it along and direct people to the website.
[Reply]
Zionism is the fascist ideology of psychopaths. That’s why non-Jews are drawn into its designs. But the root of the problem is not the ideology, in this case Zionism, nor even the underlying religion, in this case Judaism. A psychopath’s brain processes the emotional content of words differently. In fact we could say that its emotional signature flatlines upon encountering an image, word, phrase or concept that would provoke a range of emotions in a normal person. Any given ideology is just words, symbols and flags, a useful mask that cloaks the psychopaths’ true nature, their predatorial cunning and the enjoyment they derive from the suffering of others. That’s right, there is suffering in this world not IN SPITE OF our best efforts, but BECAUSE a small percentage of the population actively seek to bring it upon others!
To the psychopaths in power today, Zionism is just the contemporary vehicle, the most available means to achieve their goals of world domination. The work of Andrew Lobacewski is seminal for grasping the scale of the problem facing humanity and understanding that the only antidote to their pathological influence is shared awareness of their existence and the manner in which they operate. Political Ponerology explains that a small percentage of each population is born genetic psychopaths. Their characteristics mentioned above invariably propel them up the social scale, if they are not already concentrated among the upper classes, because competitive environments are perfect for the fullest expression of the disease. Lobacewski’s book identifies various levels or degrees of expression. One variant of psychopathy relevant to this discussion is Schizoidia or schizoidal psychopathy:
[from http://www.ponerology.com/psychopaths_3.html
“[Schizoids] are hypersensitive and distrustful, while, at the same time, pay little attention to the feelings of others. They tend to assume extreme positions, and are eager to retaliate for minor offenses. Sometimes they are eccentric and odd. Their poor sense of psychological situation and reality leads them to superimpose erroneous, pejorative interpretations upon other people’s intentions. They easily become involved in activities which are ostensibly moral, but which actually inflict damage upon themselves and others. Their impoverished psychological worldview makes them typically pessimistic regarding human nature.” (Lobaczewski, 123-4)
Emotional Unreality: The main features of schizoidia (or schizoid personality disorder) are dull emotions and a lack of feeling for psychological realities, and it is probably inherited autosomally. Their lack of emotion allows them to develop their speculative reasoning, which is useful in non-humanistic disciplines (e.g., economics and political theory).
Psychotic States: Under experiences of extreme stress, schizoids collapse into a state closely resembling schizophrenia, stifling their capacity for thought.
Schizoidal Declaration: Schizoids often betray their characteristic view of human nature in their statements and writings. “Human nature is so bad that order in human society can only be maintained by a strong power created by highly qualified individuals in the name of some higher idea.” Ironically, normal people, under the influence of schizoids and their twisted view of reality, will tend to fulfill such a view of human nature. Such open schizoidal declarations are apparent in the works of Marx and Engels, Hobbes, and various leading neoconservative intellectuals.
Role in the origin of evil
In Relationships: Schizoids often cause their families much trouble and are often poor parents. They are easily manipulated for the benefit of more clever individuals, often playing the role of “patsy”. Their simplistic “black or white” view of human reality often turns their good intentions into bad results.
On Humanity: If schizoidal views are published and widely distributed (like the writings of Marx, or of Leo Strauss), they can play a large role in the origin of evil on a mass scale. When normal people read the work of a schizoid, they are often unaware of the true nature of the author they are reading. Due to their richer psychological worldview, they tend towards a ‘corrective interpretation’ of writing which is, in fact, pathological. In this way, the deviant psychology can also be accepted by naïve individuals. Only with a proper understanding of the pathological nature of this material can one effectively read through it and immunize oneself against infection.
What’s interesting is that Lobacewski found this anomaly to be “highest among Jews” [p.88]
The book is for sale here:
http://www.qfgpublishing.com/product_info.php?products_id=54&osCsid=4d7ad094156c56e9af9d089e8a5d6952
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
September 21st, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Thanks for this. Quite fascinating.
[Reply]
The main problems is the focus on labels. Jew, Islam, pagan, black, white. Morman, communist, fascist, what have you. This is deliberately fostered by the pschyopathic element in society. This manouever conveniently takes the focus off those fomenting the divisions, allowing, as has been mentioned, them to pick the the pieces. It has very little to do with “jewish” and everthing to do with psychopathy.
The incidences of psycopathy has been calculated by several researchers (Stout, Hare, Lobeczewski) to be approximately 6% of any society, give or take. Robert Hare, in Without Conscience, and Andrew Lobeczewski in Political Ponerology, even propose that these individuals comprise a seperate tax on of humanity. Marthat Stout in The Sociopath Next Door, puts the expression rate of strong sub-criminal (non-violent) psychopathy at realy 25%! MRI scans of known criminal psychopaths show distinct differences in brain structure.
Yet most of them learn to pass as \normal\. And they have gradually shaped society to accept their traits (ruthless, glib, charm) as the ones to be admired and emulated. Think of Gordon Gecko in Wall Street. They recognize themselves as different at an early age and soon recognize those like themselves (Lobeczewski). They are also masters at playing on the emotions of normal people. Since they don’t have any it is easy to observe their victims and push the buttons as needed. Thus the pschopathic elements of Zionism have no problem playing the Holocaust card over and over to silence any criticism of their actions in the Occupied Territories. The same guilt is used to manipulate the sayanim into semi-criminal acts to aid Mossad in carrying out operations.
All the books mentioned above should be required reading for every person who aspires to live in a sane, moral, just, compassionate society. We cannot defend ourselves against an opponent we don’t understand. I would recommend The Sociopath Next Door first, then Without Conscience, then Political Poneroloy (www.ponerology.com). This will lay out the effects of the psychopathic personality on individuals, the nation, then the world at large.
Time is wasting,
Sariade
[Reply]
Jeff Gates Reply:
September 21st, 2009 at 10:38 pm
Thanks for providing the references. For those reviewing the blogs who have not yet read Guilt By Association, cut-and-paste below is a clinical definition helpful in describing those profiled in this first release in the Criminal State series. Guilt By Association can be purchased on the Criminal State website.
psychopathy n. A mental disorder roughly equivalent to antisocial personality disorder, but with emphasis on affective and interpersonal traits such as superficial charm, pathological lying, egocentricity, lack of remorse, and callousness that have traditionally been regarded by clinicians as characteristic of psychopaths, rather than social deviance traits such as need for stimulation, parasitic lifestyle, poor behavioral controls, impulsivity, and irresponsibility that are prototypical of antisocial personality disorder. Whether psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder share a common referent is an open question. Compare sociopathy. psychopath n.
[Reply]
You have hit the nail on the head with regards to psychopathy. If you follow the trail to the top of the pyramid you’re going to find very successful psychopaths. A book that really helped me understand and put a lot of the pieces of the puzzle together is Political Ponerology by Andrew M. Lobaczewski it’s a must read.
I think normal people of conscience have a hard time understanding that there are psychopaths that don’t have a conscience and who have risen to the top of government, military and corporate ladders because of their lack of any moral restraints, they can commit crimes including the murder of their own citizens and sleep well at night.
[Reply]
Excellent piece, Jeff. This gets right to the heart of the matter.
[Reply]
.
Jeff this is a well written and properly researched article. Yet it is like spagehtti without the meatball.
.
Yes the US was manipulated into War. Yes the mental threads were laid out long before (decades?) the actual event. Yes the event created the galvanizing force to raise the sleeping giant. But where is the punch-line?
.
You said………..”Only one nation had the means, motive, opportunity and stable nation state intelligence required to take the U.S. to war in the Middle East while also making it appear that Islam is the problem….”
.
How about…..only one nation had the means, motive, opportunity and state intelligence required to PERPETRATE 9-11 and had the connections, lackeys, servants, prostitutes and loyal fanatics to cover it up and lead the misdirection play to fake out a gullible nation and West that was predisposed to villify Islam due to ancient hatreds and traditional arrogance, paternalism, ignorance and bias.
.
Very simplistically Game Theory tells one, based on inputs, whether a certain strategy or action is likely, probablistically, to produce a desired end or response.
.
But with the simulataneous murder of 3000 people, we are well beyond game theory and catalyzing events.
.
In 911, all roads lead to Israel including the staging, operation, execution and justification of the “event”.
.
Call it a bitch slap to the planet without using nukes. All free thinking people of the world, of course, excluding the Zionists and their slaves, were the intended targets and victims. Unfortunately on the 3000 and the Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans and detainess around the world TOOK IT ON THE CHIN.
.
Nanothermite/Thermate anyone?
[Reply]
if you want to know the israel relationship just remember the dancing israelis when WTC collapses, or benjamin netanyahu words that said 9/11 tragedy will benefit israel. does it make sense when a plane flying to attack WTC but no US aircraft came to stop it? they knew but they let it go so that the plane goes attack WTC.
[Reply]
Every other day one read in the Zionist-controlled mainstream media about the “terrorists” (singled out by their Muslim faith) being arrested by the security officials – while according to the Justice Department, out of 200,000 federal inmates only 28 are imprisoned on terror-related convictions.
Interestingly, since 9/11 no terrorist attack on the American soil has been reported – though on several occasions, suspected Israelis have been arrested for being involved in terrorism-related activities but most of them have been deported to Israel on flimsy accuses. A survey conducted by World Public Opinion this year indicated that only 3% of Pakistanis believe that Al-Qaeda was behind 9/11 attacks.
“Among the many lies about 911, the most egregious are the ‘official ones’ put forward by the Bush administration and Bush personally. Make no mistake about it: the story of 19 Arabs hijackers coordinated from a cave in Afghanistan by a man who wa most certainly already dead of kidney failure, is the most absurd lie among them. If Bush has taken his ‘case’ to court, a ‘burden of proof’ would have been imposed. It would have been interesting to see the government prosecutors attempt to ‘prove’ a case against a man that that could not have been proven to have been alive let alone co-ordinate multiple hijacking with cell phones from inside a remote cave in Afghanistan……” Dr. David Ray Griffin in Official Lies about 911 Exposed.
Now, Barack Obama has cashed-in Nobel Peace Prize for using the same lies about 9/11 to carry-on his so-called “a just war” – while labeling Hamas, Hizb’Allah and Taliban as terrorist for waging military resistance against the foreign occupiers of their ancestral lands.
In order to give a “civilian justice” brush to old official lies – Barack Obama has announced to drag Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and other codefendants to a federal court next year. He is the latest “mastermind” behind the 9/11 and Obama has already sentenced him to death by telling MSNBC’s Chuck Todd: “I don’t think it would be offensive to all (Repulicans), when he is convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him”.
Kevin Barrett PhD, in this article has debunked all the conspiracy charges against Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. “KSM and other men on trail are scapegoats, like the victims of Stalin’s (a Jew, under whose rule close to 40 million Russian Christians and two million Muslims were killed) show trails and the Inquisition’s witch trails. Apprently, the most important evidence will come from alleged confessions extracted from men tortured and held for years in solitary confinement at the Guantanamo Bay prison.
Interestingly, Osama Bin Laden, who was claimed to be the “mastermind” behind 9/11 after the attack an excuse to invade Afghanistan – did not make to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted poster. On June 5, 2006, when author Ed Haas called FBI office about this – he was informed by Rex Tom, Chief of Investigative Publicity: “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11?.
Talking about evidence, below is a video of two Israeli soldiers who admit about their country’s terrorist activities against Palestinians.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/911-the-lie-that-refuses-to-go-away/
[Reply]
“Know your enemy.”
Good advice – if you know who your real enemy is. Don’t believe any Zionist fairy tales told to you by the government or the MSM.
Jeff, I just came across your website today. Thank you for affirming and broadcasting the truth. I will read your book at the earliest opportunity.
One month ago, in December, my whole world was turned upside down when I learned who the real enemy is. Ever since Obama won the Democratic nomination I knew he was a fraud and I wasted two years making the case that he is a Muslim Marxist usurper, a British subject who by definition cannot be a natural born U.S. Citizen, that the birth certificate is a red herring, and that he is a puppet of the globalist elite, who will replace him with another puppet at their pleasure.
Here are excerpts from my blog, after my epiphany:
(Dec.3, 2010)
Joe Farah and Helen Thomas, both journalists of Arab descent, are on opposing sides in the globalist instigated “War on Terrorism” (aka Christianity v. Islam). The lifeblood of the globalist movement is war, strife and economic hardship, which has the desired effect of filling their coffers and thinning the population.
Why is Zionism like Islamic jihad? Both exploit religion for political purposes. Most people are inherently peace-loving and non-violent, whether they be Jewish or Muslim. The radical elements of the two religions seek not religious fulfillment but power. Orthodox Jews are actually against Zionism.
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/history.cfm
The world is kept in a perpetual state of war by the globalists through propaganda, covert intervention, and economic crisis. Even nations at peace, not in armed conflict, feel the need to maintain an aggressive military stance, ready to attack at the slightest provocation. False flag attacks are common precursors to war, such as assassinations (Archduke Ferdinand) or attacks (Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, 9/11). Peacetime conflicts prey on people’s fears: the Cold War to “stop the spread of communism” or the War on Terrorism to “prevent terrorist attacks by Islamic jihadists.”
The troika of the CIA, Mossad and Al-Queda has created conditions for a “perfect storm” for the New World Order. Having survived over two centuries of subversive influence, the United States has fallen to a bloodless and silent coup that has compromised every branch of government: a usurper President and a legislature and judiciary that wantonly ignore the Constitution.
(Dec. 11, 2010)
I am one of the many deceived by Zionist propaganda into believing that today’s Israel is the prophesied homeland of the Jews, and that Palestine was an uninhabited wasteland before the return of the Diaspora. Any criticism of Israel unleashes the guilt-laden anti-Semitic label.
One slight problem with the Zionist version of history. Palestine was not uninhabited, not a wasteland, and Zionists falsely ascribed religious legitimacy to their imperialistic socialist nation building. From http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com: “In order to maintain a Jewish majority in the state of ‘Israel’, its leaders promote anti-Semitism throughout the world to ‘encourage’ Jews to leave their homelands and seek ‘refuge’.”
I urge the reader to visit these websites for the full story:
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
http://www.rense.com/general91/debun.htm
The Zionist deception – establishing a Jewish state – was masterminded by the globalist elite, with the support and funding of secular Jews, many of them American, to establish a dominant presence in the Middle East, later reinforced with a nuclear arsenal.
How does WND and Joseph Farah fit into this picture? Joseph Farah is one of Israel’s biggest cheerleaders. As a Christian of Lebanese descent, he has gravitas and appeals to all sides. WND’s incessant warnings of Armageddon and the threat of Islamic jihad makes him (hard to believe unwitting) a key player in the globalist plan to instigate World War III, aka the “War on Terror” – or, as I mentioned before, Christianity v. Islam.
Next on the globalist menu: geographically, Iran is situated between Iraq and Afghanistan. Why is Obama violating one of his major campaign promises and maintaining a strong presence in the area?
(Dec. 12, 2010)
Orly Taitz is another high profile figure in the Zionist deception. Again with Orly, as with Joseph Farah, I “took the bait” and have been singing Orly’s praises for the past 2 years.
Until I saw “Mossad” and “Orly” in the same sentence, it never occurred to me that Orly, my Jeanne d’Arc heroine, could have anything but the noblest intentions. As Reagan was fond of saying, “trust, but verify.”
Look at the facts. Orly’s background is the perfect cover story: growing up in a Soviet bloc country, knowing the evils of Communism firsthand, getting a dental degree in Israel, then coming to America and finding time to juggle a dental practice, dabbling in real estate, advanced martial arts training, raising 3 sons, obtaining a law degree, and then suddenly gaining international notoriety by launching a one-woman crusade to expose Obama as a fraud.
Serendipity? Not when you add Orly’s husband Yosef Taitz into the equation. Why does Orly, with a computer expert husband, plead ignorance and seek assistance in all things computer related, while soliciting donations from her multimillion dollar home in southern California?
Yosef Taitz, a Latvian-born software engineer from California visiting Israel in 1987, met Orly on an arranged date, proposed 4 months later, then brought her back home to the U.S. and married her. Now Yosef is CEO of Daylight Chemical Information Systems, which provides artificial intelligence software vital to Novartis for the production of pandemic-level designer viruses such as H1N1 – obtained by Mossad infiltration into the biological warfare labs at Ft. Detrick.
“BELIEVE IT – OR NOT!”
[Reply]